Foetus ≠ baby. If you wanna go as far as to say that a human being is formed at the moment of conception, then we can go one step further and say that jacking off is genocide. That's what the Texas politician's point was when she made that silly anti-masturbation law, in fact. People got so outraged without realizing it's satire.

Exactly, that's what I always say as well. If you force someone to have a child, you're not punishing them, you're punishing the child by forcing it to live with unprepared parents who didn't want it in the first place.

I'm curious though, when you were a kid, how did you imagine the baby Jesus that "brought presents"? Me and a lot of people I've talked to never really imagined it as a human baby, more like some kind of entity made of light. I guess it's because we knew that Jesus had been dead for centuries and therefore cannot assume human form but idk.

I'm not bragging, they're actually a burden for my back :c and I have to wear sports bras under high-waisted dresses because with a normal bra the waist would be moved way up and it would look crappy

Yeah, Vimeo did the trick

Not available in my country :c

Hmm, I just thought about this and in my mother tongue (Czech), this logic works as well! I do wonder in how many languages is this a thing.

Priorities.

Yes which is why I wrote it's okay to disagree with religion, it's also okay to agree with religion. You're 100% entitled to your opinions as long as you can properly defend them with good arguments. But also telling someone to stop doing something because it's against your beliefs is wrong too (or at least hella annoying) because it's their lifestyle, not yours. Again you can disagree with their lifestyle all you want but you have to accept the fact that it's within their freedom to live a certain way (unless it's illegal of course)

People have different belifs which is cool BUT some people try very hard to impose their beliefs onto others, which should be targeted. He's a comedian ffs, when he makes fun of people who try to force their religion onto others, making fun of said religion is "collareral damage".
And even then, what's wrong with disagreeing with (some parts of) religion? As long as you keep it a civil debate, there is no issue.

Well obviously, if you want to make a thought-provoking point then it would make no sense to target Zoroastrianism because not that many people know it and therefore not that many people would even get your point. Likewise, if you want to criticize modern music you criticize Minaj or Biebs, not some unknown rapper, because more people know what you're talking aboot.

Indeed. And I don't care if someone is religious, as long as they don't try to forcefully impose it on other people or the state.

That's why I specifically gave examples. Nobody's dumb enough to think that I said it's the same when I gave the example of a beheading versus an unused law.

Indeed.

Yeah dude, and you've got a NASA Space Center which is awesome. Science rules. I didn't mean to hate on Texas, it was supposed to be a stereotype that would demonstrate my point. Many people imagine Bible-thumping rednecks when they hear "Texas" or "southern states" which I meant as a demonstration of the fact that religious fundamentalism doesn't only exist in the third world.