That's not the truth, you're just a racist twat.

It does sound like something Ben Carson would say.

If you look up her name you'll find out she's basically a Jessica Nigri or SuperMaryFace type of "cosplayer" – all her fame is really the work of her plastic surgeon, she just puts those plastic balloons on display.
Also, lol "Sarkissian" – distant relative of Anita? Maybe changed her name a little bit not to be associated with her lol

I think OP is referring to the fact that in many businesses there's this "customer is always right" policy which makes bosses/managers suck up to customers and punish employees for the smallest things. So if we're speaking in context of such a business, then the boss is actually great for such a basic human decency.
And I'm guessing he was nicer to OP because OP might have autism or something, seeing as the rude customer called him/her a "retard". Or maybe it's just because it was OP's first day, everybody's confused on their first day.
In any case, rude customers should be scorned, not catered to like many businesses do. I think there was a post about this exact thing quite recently, where the OP compared these rude customers to children throwing a tantrum.

https://reproductive-health-journal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1742-4755-6-14
I'd also like to add that conservative religious people are less likely to use contraceptives and are usually against abortion. It's not evidence, however these are arguments which may later be used to form an inductive theory. And the data speak quite clearly.
In terms of this picture alone, however, I agree. It demonstrates the point but doesn't back it. Then again, it's just a picture from Cracked, what else could we expect?

Yes, causation. If you don't tell kids about sex, pregnancy, STDs and protection, they will try to figure stuff out for themselves. If you just tell them "don't do it" without the reasons why, they will be even more tempted to figure it out. It's just simple induction.
This mentality is more common in deeply religious states, which are also the ones with most teen pregnancies.
http://www.livescience.com/45355-teen-pregnancy-rates-by-state.html
http://www.worldatlas.com/articles/the-most-religious-states-in-america.html
Correlation? Yes. Causation? Also yes.

Same thing really

They're probably just fake

Y downvotes?

Aww, that's inspiring. In my family it's always been the male name tradition for as long as I remember (which is like 3 generations), but those were different times and people didn't think about stuff the way we do nowadays.
When it comes to hyphenating, I think it's a good option, though the children will have to decide on a name anyway since they would have a super long name if everybody kept hyphenating. But that's all on the couple and their decision, I think that the surname of their future children is an important matter which they should discuss together, not just "BAM! Whoever has a dick gets to keep their name. You don't have a dick? Welp, good luck getting used to a new surname which you'll be using for at least a couple years, maybe till the rest of your life."

*than.
So… because you earn more money than someone, you have a legal right to OWN them?

@lane6 I personally always found this "take the man's name" tradition stupid. Firstly, it comes from a time when women were seen and treated as property which is why marriage was basically a "you were your dad's property, now you're your husband's" (in my mother tongue we even add a possessive suffix to female surnames, like if your dad's name is Smith, your mom's name -if they're married of course- would be Smith's), but honestly I don't want to get too deep into that because I don't want to attract any SJWs to this thread.
Secondly, and this is the more important point, I always found it the most logical and practical thing to just take the nicer name. What if your husband has a shitty, long, hard to pronounce surname and you have an okay one? Isn't this in everyone's interest to take the better one?

^indeed. But to people with extreme views, everyone who doesn't share those views is a monster.

Everything is so politicized it's nearly impossible to distinguish purely social and socio-political context nowadays. SJWs and feminists have a political agenda, just like the people who so strongly oppose them.

In this situation, he was just trolling her in a very childish way. But yes, it was a joke.
However, I was rather speaking of the general situation. When you disagree with an SJW, you get called a Nazi racist sexist Trump supporter. When you disagree with a far-right / alt-right person, you get called a feminazi SJW beta cuck. Neither of them are capable of proper arguments, and they think that because you disagree with them, you're automatically "the enemy". (Reminds me out Outlast 2 lol)
This happened to me quite recently, all I did was ask a Trump supporter for proof of what caused Trump to fire Comey. To me, it makes logical sense that he'd fire him for the investigation (although I don't buy into this Russia thing), and he said it's "been proven a lie", which is why I asked him for said proof. Did he provide any? No. Did he instead call me a "Democrat's whore" even though I'm centrist? Yes.
There's no reasoning with some people because they don't see beyond their precious teams

Idk, I was recently on a trip with a few classmates from uni and I was put in a room where all my roommates were boys. One evening, they decided to tell each other private life stories. They're not even dudebros, they're actually quite smart guys, but damn, those stories and the way they talked about girls as just some kind of achievements hit me hard. The harder it was since I knew all of them and knew they weren't your ordinary douchebag dudebros, just normal guys. Is this what happens when you put a bunch of guys together? Because honestly that experience was quite insightful, but probably not in a good way.