I'm not telling anyone what to do. I'm just criticizing boob "cosplayers". You're getting way too defensive here, and you're putting words in my mouth, because I never said I want to control anyone or stop what they're doing. For example, con artists earn by screwing people over. Can they? Yes. Can I criticize them for it? Also yes. The fact that I think someone's way of earning money is unjust doesn't mean I will try to stop them. But I'm just exercising my free speech right by criticizing them.

Sure but if you only profit off of the fact that you have boobs, there's something wrong. Plus there are many cosplayers like Jess Nigri or CinnamonToastKen's girlfriend who just bought themselves fake tits and profit off of that, putting underwear with a certain color scheme on and saying it's cosplay. Cosplay is art, not porn. Sure, if your cosplay is also well made, you put a lot of work into it and you want to show some skin, sure. But if your cosplay is shitty and you overcompensate with fake tits, then we have a problem. Because sadly, horny teenage boys who are the main source of funds for cosplayers would rather pay to see big boobs in a crappy cosplay than something well crafted that they can't jerk off to.

Agreed. I wouldn't mind if OP *at least* chose a good post. This chick just does attention whoring cleavage "cosplays".

1) Necrobump. C'mon the post is 3 years old. 2) So did some women when female birth control was originally tested back in the day. https://www.dailydot.com/irl/male-birth-control-trials-women/ And mental problems are just the tip of the iceberg, I mean you can die from a blood clot because of BC. And I can tell you from my personal experience that even today's female birth control isn't perfect. The first time I had a real depression (not just sad feelings) and terrible mood swings was when I started taking hormonal birth control. It was like my soul was devoid of any emotions, and then suddenly it was all rage. It messes with you in ways that are unimaginable for men. I'm not saying "a guy died, so what?" No of course that guy must be taken into account but women made big sacrifices too and we still keep making them (seriously just google side effects of hormonal birth control), so why should we have all the responsibility that stems from these sacrifices, while men have none?

I had to google what it is. It looks awesome.

Lol Robot Chicken is the best

How can anyone hate dogs? Dogs are amazing!

I know what an echochamber looks like. About a year ago I joined the social network by the name of Minds. It's based on the idea of absolute free speech. At first I loved it because absolute free speech, and I still cherish that idea, however the problem is that this idea later attracted mainly far right wing nuts who were blocked from mainstream social networks like Facebook or Twitter. One of the most popular posts, and I'm not exaggerating right now, is a post saying that ALL Jews are evil and have some evil agenda. The "evidence"? One Facebook post by one asshole Jew who said Jews are better than Goyim. Naturally I asked for evidence of this so-called Jew agenda. Was I given any? No. Was I called a "filthy Jew" (I'm a European atheist with no Jewish ancestry), "too dumb to understand", and in other similarly crazy posts a "shill", a "democrats' whore" and so on? Yes. THAT is what an echochamber looks like. Not this. (2/2)

Echochamber? You're the one saying "period stuff shouldn't be even mentioned in conversation", you're the one who would be happier in an echochamber where only certain things can be said and free speech is limited. Everyone else here is just stating their opinions and actually encouraging conversation. Literally nobody said "leave if you disagree with us", we've all just stated that we disagree with you. If being disagreed with offends you to the point you have to leave because you're unable to defend your opinion, well, then you might find it difficult to stomach free speech.
(1/2)

In fact the women:men ratio is closer to 51:49. Men are a bit less than half of the population. So what you're saying is that the majority should submit to the minority because the minority is somehow offended by vaginal functions? I'm sorry but to me this seems no different than the SJWs saying what we should and shouldn't joke about because it may offend someone. Free speech is free speech, and at least on the internet there are loads of jokes about morning wood/sweaty balls in the summer/awkward erections and other penis related stuff all the time. Why are vaginas so stigmatized while penises aren't? It's even a thing in video games, for example Jim Sterling made a video about it, and even he, a dude, was like "Why the fuck are people so afraid of vaginas while penises are okay?" http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=meM4yvlhDPA

Dude, middle school boys draw dicks on EVERYTHING. So your previous argument of "well it doesn't happen with boys" doesn't fully fit here. Just for the record, we're talking middle/high school boys here, because obviously no sane grown man would squeal at a period.
And yes, if someone talks about their period in detail, it might get a bit weird/gross. However, 99% of situations are about pads, tampons and other hygienic stuff. It doesn't make sense to me that someone would get legitimately grossed out by that, it's like getting grossed out by talking about band-aids or skincare products.

I see.
Still, I don't understand why my comment got downvoted when basically all it said was "don't insult people just because they're different from you."

Lol I didn't even know "twink" was a slang word meaning a gay person. Maybe if people actually strived for equality instead of spending time making up new insults for people who are different from them, the world would be a better place.

It's pretty obvious he's trying to suck in his cheeks to make his cheekbones appear bigger. Normal cheekbones, even if they're big, don't make you look like you have an actual dent in your face.

Funny thing is that croquembouches didn't exist at the time. At least from what I managed to google Beauty and the Beast is set around 1740 (the time the original novel was written) while the croquembouche as we know it today was invented by a French chef in the late 18th/early 19th century. But the site also says that something like the croquembouche existed since the 1500s but it wasn't really the same thing, so it's hard to tell.

If you're talking about Nazi pug, he did it also for comical reasons but mainly to piss off his girlfriend because she was apparently always going on about how cute the pug is so he made him into the least cute thing possible, a Nazi.