I'm guessing it's a reply to my comment since I mentioned trickle down economics. Trickle down will never work because of people like Gucci himself. He could've paid his workers better, made better work conditions. Instead, he has his stuff made in sweatshops (allegedly) and buys a huge fucking cake and a diamond sword. Similarly, the bakery you mentioned, how much of that outrageously high sum do you think is going to the workers compared to how much is going to the CEO? I'd wager that the workers aren't getting that much. I see it on my own asshole boss as well, our office printers don't work but instead of having them fixed he travels to a different place every week then brags about it on social media.
As long as people are greedy bastards, trickle down will never work because these greedy bastards will use the money on ridiculously expensive shit (the price of which will again go to greedy bastards not employees) instead of treating their employees like human beings.

( X ) doubt

And why he's so adorable!

Not sure I agree with your whole "us vs them" dichotomy, I'm personally for religious freedom. However it's her life, and if she shares your beliefs, she won't marry a non-Jewish person. If not, it's her life and her choices and there's not much you can do about it.
Do you live in Israel, by the way?

I guess FS people aren't very good at taking jokes. Welp, at least I tried.

*puts tape over Trump's mouth and wraps his phone in it so he can't tweet*
You were saying?

Why are you against her marrying a christian? I'm just wondering because I grew up in an irreligious place and never really gave this kind of situation much thought. Is it because of different traditions/holidays?

Thank you. It just drives me nuts when people downvote without stating why. I know it's not their responsibility or obligation to say why they disagree, but I just always found it to be the common sense thing to do. So that you can have a discussion and maybe even persuade the other person to change their mind instead of making them wonder who disagrees with them and why.

>speaks about prejudice against atheism
>gets downvoted
Point proven.

Not gonna lie, my cooking skills aren't great either. I can make a pretty decent meal when I follow a recipe but I can't improvise, I can't just take some stuff in my kitchen and whip up a meal. But following an easy recipe is just so trivial I find it hard to understand how anyone could get intimidated by it. Plus there are so many cooking videos out there that even if you were a total beginner and didn't even know how to boil eggs, you'd find a video about it.

Dude, I think you should teach him to cook some basic meals. You won't always be there to babysit him unless you're a stay at home wife. Also cooking is sooooo easy, I don't understand how people can just say "I won't cook cause I can't do it". In my personal experience guys saying "I can't cook so I let my girlfriend/wife do it" are only making excuses because they enjoy laying on the couch as their wife does everything. But hey I don't know your situation at all, I can't judge you or your husband and I really don't want to sound hostile so basically, if you two have an agreement on this or you legitimately enjoy cooking and want to do it as much as you can, then all power to you. I just have some strong feelings on this because I don't want people to end up like my mom who's like a servant to my dad. She's not a stay at home wife either, she has a full time job with the same amount of hours as my dad but she also cleans, cooks and does everything around the house.

That is beautiful.

The same employee would barely pass high school today. But the companies prefer those to college educated people. On one hand I get it, experience in the field is important. On the other hand, this results in smart people being governed by... not so smart people. Not to mention that generally, people in high positions tend to be arrogant and rarely accept advice from lower level employees. So companies are stuck in the status quo, run by people who fear change and won't accept ideas from people who are smarter than them out of arrogance. Then they blame the lower level employees for the company's bad sales, not realizing that the consumers want innovation, not status quo, which is what the college educated people could give them, if they weren't stuck under someone who is stubborn towards change and innovation.
Thirdly, I agree on his point on technology, social media are addictive, but they're good for organizing events and talking to friends, so long as you don't abuse them. (2/2)