I know I'm late to the party but I'd like to chime in with these two articles:
https://i-d.vice.com/en_uk/article/43w5nn/the-bmi-debate-how-do-you-measure-the-health-of-models
https://luxuryactivist.com/fashion/top-models-body-mass-index-health-red-alert/
So yeah models are seriously underweight and if you find that attractive, that's your preference (although I would feel pretty terrible about myself if I only dated people who have severe health issues because of their weight), just don't try to make it the highest standard because it's just not good for people's health, physical and mental.

Princess, I wasn't asked a direct question, there was nothing for me to respond to. That said, question 1-3 are not about that at all, I don't know where you got that from. Question 1 is about a stressful environment, question 2 about unrealistic employers' standards and question 3 about shitty colleagues. Questions 4-6 deal with a similar topic, which I guess could be summarized into not feeling adequately paid for the work you put in. It seems more likely that OP is frustrated about employers exploiting the fact that most people don't know what they're worth, or if they do, they just don't have enough balls to ask for a raise, and this goes as far as the employer trying to find out whether they can get away with underpaying someone at the very beginning, during the interview. But it is all hyperbolic, and I can't see into the author's head, so me trying to seriously figure out if this means this or that would be as foolish as you just proclaiming that OP wants free shit.

I mean... 'at least he's not a rapist' is a low bar but you're right, it's good that he's not hurting anybody

Not debunking and just making sassy sarcastic comments. That's the closest I've ever seen someone admit they've run out of arguments without really admitting it.

I love how princess just assumed that OP is a lazy fuck who wants free shit based on one hyperbolic post and then went on a fucking rant about people wanting everybody to cater to their pwecious feewings and how matthewg is a safe space needing snowflake even though his comment said nothing even close to that.
This is just anecdotal and therefore only reflective of my own experience but I've noticed that the "facts over feelings" crowd really likes to jump to conclusions (aka their personal feelings about something) based on almost no facts. The irony.

Haha, thanks, I completely forgot I wrote this comment

I'm a young fart and I consider that atrocious. OP is lucky she woke up at the right time, otherwise a terrible crime would've been committed.
That said, I guess the penguin meme was used because, well, there isn't any other meme format that would deal with that sort of thing. Nor should there be, because it'd indicate that it's normal which it's definitely not.

LOL ok that's a good one. The crime lord of dog treat trafficking. [Undertale reference intensifies]

Or Bark Wahlberg? Barky Bark?

Did you write this comment high? Cause the post is 3 YEARS OLD.
I mean no offense, just joking around.

Bit of a necrobump but you're not wrong. The older threads pretty much already said it all.

Calling someone a beta cuckold devaluates your whole point. Not that there was one to begin with in your comment. But if there was, it'd be devaluated by now.

I'm an atheist! *smugly tips fedora*
No really, probably devil because I'm terrible at sports so I'd just sit on the bench and chat to him, since we've never got to hear his side of the story and I'd like to know. I mean, I really am an atheist but in this scenario we're assuming that these two exist so...

No it's because he's an upstanding member of society.

They call themselves "identitarians" now.
Don't know why though, the Nazi label has become so overused and diluted that even if they did call themselves Nazis, everybody would just assume that it's a satirical reference to SJWs calling everyone they disagree with Nazis.