No probs lol

You posted it as a reply to me so I was notified, is all.

Yes. I wrote a comment 4 years ago because of a post made 3 hours ago.

.... Ok that actually sounds heckin cute

Yeah that's more like it

Bruh this is not about not asking questions out of curiosity because someone might get offended somewhere. This is about how out of place the question is. If the first thing that pops into your mind when someone offers to help people in need is "okay but like did they appreciate it enough", there's something wrong. You don't help people to get them to kiss your feet, you help them because you're a decent fucking person.

Why do you even care about that? What are you trying to prove? So if a few of them weren't respectful, we should just let all homeless people freeze to death? Like, I don't get what's your reason for even asking this question.

Maybe like 99% persuasion or something since he hid the fact that the ring was drawing him in for so long

Now I'm genuinely curious what's painful for cars. Being welded to something would be painful, I guess. Broken windows, sure. What about a popped tire? Or are those like shoes? What about having a spoiler attached, does that count as body modification, like a piercing? Does leaking oil feel like a loose bowel? I feel like there needs to be some more lore.

No

That's actually hilarious, I didn't think of that, I just imagined polyps.
Edit: I just got a stream of probably singular downvotes on each and every one of my comments on this post. Someone's mad that they're wrong. And I find that absolutely hilarious.

I have read that entry, yes. Took me a while to find though because before that there were many entries from other dictionaries that say octopi is simply incorrect, so I wonder if it actually took you some digging to find the entry or if it's just a region locked difference in search results. I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and assume it's the latter.
Merriam-Webster basically says that so many people have been using it erroneously in the past that it became normalised. It also says that the word "had a stay" in New Latin – which was a kind of revival of Latin by medieval scholars which included mixing in words that weren't originally Latin. Neologisms, if you will. In fact, latin-dictionary.net says that the correct translation of octopus is "polypus".
In conclusion, it's still not correct but it's so normalised people will look at you weird if you use anything else.

Totally fine with that. Vote with your wallet (on an individual-company level, not by bribing politicians of course). But the number of people who stopped buying merch or watching is pretty small compared to the scale of the crying that was done online and in the news. Which just makes me think there's a lot of hypocrisy and slacktivism going on among Kaepernick's critics.

And it hasn't, I just like to use people's rhetorical strategies against them

Here's my problem with that (and I'm sure guest_ will be able to address it better than me because I'm not as eloquent): The NFL decided not to fire him. It was a decision made by the company, yada yada. But many Republicans were calling for him to be fired. Isn't meddling in private companies' affairs kind of against what Republicans are supposed to support?

*octopuses or octopodes
"Octopi" is incorrect because the word octopus comes from Greek, not Latin.
Sorry for being a pedant. But so many pedants tried to correct me when I said octopuses that I just get this urge to out-pedant everyone when I see someone use this word now.