Very incorrect, but there is no use trying to have a conversation with someone who hasn't read anything about the topic and only responds with talking points. Read Arendt and then come back and we can discuss. Until then, adios.

A CEO needs to keep employees "content" only because there are laws for it. Back when there weren't any, people's jaws were falling off due to phosphorus poisoning. One would hardly call those people content.
As for the rest, a dictator has advisors, family members/heirs, and the international community that he or she has to be at least somewhat accountable to. You smugly ask if me or mrfahrenheit (not sure who this question was meant for) know about gulags or concentration camps. Maybe it's you who should read up on the topic. I suggest you start with Totalitarianism by Hannah Arendt, because it seems your perception of a dictatorship is no more than a caricature, since you can't see the parallels with corporate hierarchy.

Then I ask again, what are the differences in terms of the hierarchy within which they operate?

So the only difference between CEOs and dictators is that CEOs are restricted by state regulations?

What are the differences in terms of the hierarchy within which they operate?

They do but you can achieve that effect without adding any crap if you stir the eggs with a whisk. But tbh I prefer my scrambled eggs more chunky.

"nobody checks but if you get caught you'll be in trouble" ... caught by whom when nobody checks? Is there some chromosome sensor technology I'm not aware of? Or just cameras zooming on people's junk when they whip it out to pee? First of all that'd be a totalitarian police state so no thanks, I like having the freedom of not being spied on with every step I take. Second of all it still doesn't control for post-op trans people so it wouldn't even work. In fact even the chromosome sensor wouldn't work because of Swyer syndrome and just the fact that chromosomes are a bit more complicated than XX and XY.

iirc she also said the lock was broken or something. Maybe she forgot to lock it and was making it up, idk. I'd believe her, I've seen worse than broken locks in bathrooms in gas stations in the middle of nowhere.

Exactly! I've been saying that whenever this gets reposted. Clearly there must be a reason why she's resorted to an ultimatum, since he probably didn't listen to anything prior. Him saying "well I would obviously choose you but since you're giving me this ultimatum it means you don't respect me so it's over" isn't a clever argument, it just shows he's choosing the games.

Sex. What you're "born as" is sex, not gender.
Also, "don't use the bathroom" is a hot fucking take.

Personally I don't but philosophically I do?

I mean yeah but if your go-to "solution" for relationship problems is cheating, you need a LOT of introspection.