I said the tweet is TERF stuff, not the author necessarily, nor you. Read the comment again please. And then once again, for good measure.
I didn't decide to twist anything, the post says "omg people are labeling women 'menstruators'!", I just reacted to what it said. (And also for context this is a very common TERF argument/"concern". Idk if you're unaware of that or just playing ignorant as a gotcha so I'm just mentioning it to let ya know.) I really don't get how you got to the conclusion that I'm somehow being disingenuous by literally just reacting to what the post says.
But it's alright, whatever's going on in your life you seem to be coping with it by throwing personal attacks at people who disagree with you. I hope that whatever's going on, it can get resolved quickly and successfully. Last year, and this year so far for that matter, haven't been kind to people's mental health. I'd suggest you seek professional help rather than insulting people you know nothing about, eh?

>taking this personally
>victim by proxy
>ALWAYS manage to... (used this argument twice over hundreds of conversations but ok)
Damn hon, looks like you've set a personal record of baseless assumptions made in one comment. Would've been more productive to show me who exactly is pushing for these "menstruator" and "birthing person" terms, y'know just argue against the substance of my comment, but you do you.
Anyway I recommend you watch "Gender Critical" by ContraPoints, she's more eloquent and patient with these sorts of arguments than I.

Never met one like that but if you have in larger numbers, that's fucked up.
For a bloody long time, society was set up for women to support their men and their personal/career growth, and sacrifice their own in the process. It's not equality to just flip the roles.

Perfect!

Is he... Lil Dogg?
... I'll see myself out

True but many are also barely noticeable, such as XYY where the symptoms are basically above average height, acne prone skin and learning problems. Or triple X which barely have symptoms at all.
I'm not a geneticist and I don't have the data so I won't contest you on the statement that most manifest in severe health issues, but I'm really curious if there are any statistics on the population distribution of these more "noticeable" syndromes as opposed to the more "healthy looking" ones.

I think especially when dealing with such large numbers as the human population, 1.7% is a lot. That's like, what, one out of every 60 people you meet? I'd say that's quite a large number.