Oh why....why did I click on that link? I feel like my head is going to explode. Please tell me she has not reproduced and doesn't plan to. She's so stupid. And she's not alone either. Good grief these people walk among us. Now I'm afraid to go outside. You.....what have you done?
You can't reason with creationists. They keep saying "evolution doesn't have enough evidence" or just directly "there is no evidence of evolution"... Well, evolution has plenty more evidence than creationism. In fact, there IS no evidence of god, or that he created humans and everything we know. "Your only 'evidence' of evolution are this drawings that you can't prove right", says the person who believes in what a book says yet has no material evidence that supports their theory. We have plenty of evidence. Our DNA is known to be sort of connected with other soecies and we can easily reazon about it as a family tree. Almost every museum has expositions which include fossiles or exact copies of them. That is enough evidence for people like me, but if you need more, explain why do primates have so much in common with human beeings not only in the fisical appearence but also in the cognitive display?
Her intelligence is closer to an ape's than a human's (also she's uglylike one) so its safe to say she is the missing link. Thus, I conclude that there is proof of evolution.
I'm not the same guest as the one above, but I myself believe God created the universe, but the way this woman was being so rude to this man, then saying everyone deserves the same respect was unbelievable. She needs to practice what she preaches, and also not lie about there being no hostility too. She was obviously attacking him for believing different. It's people like her that make others think Christians are arrogant. I'm not an arrogant person by nature at all, but if I tell someone (who doesn't believe in creation) what I believe they immediately call me arrogant and shut me down. I'm a sensitive person, and to see this happening to more than just myself bothers me. One person (like this lady) does not make up the entirety of believers, so thank you for saying something positive. It's great to see someone that's not letting their emotions flare. :)
3Reply
deleted
· 10 years ago
Have I been saying Evolution wrong this WHOLE time?
Actually, there isn't much proof for evolution. Most of their reasons and evidence have been shown to be false. But here's the thing: I'm not going to tell you all of the reasons evolution is wrong. If you actually care, you will open a new tab and start googling. Try something like "reasons that carbon dating doesn't prove evolution". Or even better: "difference between macro and micro evolution", that way you actually know what you are arguing for. So there you go: if you actually care, and are no just mindlessly repeating your opinion in the comment section, do your research. Also, for the record, I do believe that micro evolution happens, just not macro evolution. I am a Christian, but I'm not asking you to become one, I'm just asking you to really look at the whole debate. I have looked at proof for evolution. Finally, for people who do look this stuff up, and still believe it, I don't have a problem with that. In fact, I would rather that you were well informed than on my side.
Actually I have done my research. And if you intend to somehow disprove carbon dating or something like that, you should take your bullshit elsewhere. Any objections raised by creationists to carbon dating have already been addressed by scientists. I think you'll find when you look a little further that any supposed chinks in the method of carbon dating presented by creationists really just result from them ignoring evidence. As for what you said about micro and macro evolution, I already know that both of those are, and I know that there's pretty solid evidence for both (Micro is pretty much proven since it can be observed in a single generation). I'm not really sure how you can believe in Micro evolution, but not acknowledge what it clearly leads to over time, which is macro evolution.
I looked at several creationist websites to see what their objections were to carbon dating, and I'll admit that they seemed sound at first, but then when I dug a little deeper I found the appropriate scientific response to every objection.
As for micro and macro evolution, I'm still not quite sure what your objection is. You have said that you acknowledge micro evolution, which is small changes in a species driven by many different factors over the course of one or two generations, but you don't see how those small changes can build up over time, which is macro evolution? Things like natural selection and genetic drift force species to change and over the course of the billions of years that life has been evolving on our planet, those forces and others have produced massive changes.
Evolution is something changing over time. Natural selection is a theory, based on available evidence, to explain why evolution occurred with life forms. It's a small detail, sorry for being nit-picky.
As for micro and macro evolution, I'm still not quite sure what your objection is. You have said that you acknowledge micro evolution, which is small changes in a species driven by many different factors over the course of one or two generations, but you don't see how those small changes can build up over time, which is macro evolution? Things like natural selection and genetic drift force species to change and over the course of the billions of years that life has been evolving on our planet, those forces and others have produced massive changes.