Comments
Follow Comments Sorted by time
guest
· 10 years ago
· FIRST
Both
20
piaffe
· 10 years ago
Art
18
allpower1227
· 10 years ago
Do they own the building?
14
boredatwork
· 10 years ago
Or commissioned piece of art...
14
ns
· 10 years ago
Basically, no matter how good it is, if you do it on someone else's property without their consent, it is graffiti, and it is douchey as fuck. Kind of like someone scratching a masterpiece on your brand new phone's screen, but more expensive.
23
chocolatefeces
· 10 years ago
Not entirely true, because a blank wall serves no purpose like a phone screen does. It's just blank, ugly to look at, and boring. If I owned that building and someone made that without my consent, I'd hunt them down to pay them, not prosecute them.
▼
ns
· 10 years ago
Yeah, but you don't know if everyone would be so appreciative. You can't just assume that everyone would like your art, or that they are wrong if they want their property to be blank. If they wanted it painted, they'd hire someone to do it.
8
ns
· 10 years ago
While both parties have no right to force their artistic choices upon one another, the owner of the said property gets the final decision on how or whether it will be painted.
8
·
Edited 10 years ago
deleted
· 10 years ago
They took 16 days to make this, in plain sight. Definitely nothing to do with illegal graffiti, and your title sucks.
21
guest
· 10 years ago
Artalism
6
zachg
· 10 years ago
A little bit of both...
1
teresammm
· 10 years ago
They can come over to my house anytime!
1
ewqua
· 10 years ago
Alfons Mucha was such a cool dude. I love his art style.
2
potatoninja
· 10 years ago
V-art-dalism?
1
guest
· 10 years ago
Beauty
1
guest
· 9 years ago
Art
1
wildbill77
· 9 years ago
Art
turtlepants
· 8 years ago
Yes.