Going places

http://d3mfoxizwrqdu.cloudfront.net/Blogs/mitch_knox/year-end/doge.jpg

In other words, if he doesn't conform to societal standards he will have difficulty living in this world. Well, this world is dominated by those, who challenge obedience rather than submissively serving the state without question. In all, you're making radical generalizations based on a primary school homework sheet, just think about it. Look, I get it. You were trying to make a joke, but of course, it was silly and you can't complain that it backfired in your face. Nobody agrees with what you're saying for a REASON. I think what he said was ethical, and so often in society injustice continues to exist because people fail to speak up against it. Hitting animals is wrong, that's not a matter of opinion, that's actually a crime so if anything, by ironic inversion he has actually stated something that agrees with the state. Conform, don't express your opinions and fight? Thank goodness people don't actually follow what you say, otherwise we'd be a monotonous society filled with sheep

I suggest you read Slavoj Zizek, he's an amazing political mind (albeit a crazy Marxist) but his views on violence, committed through the state shed light on certain realities.

Well, keep in mind that seec is probably an animal abuser.

So you assume that I'm an animal abuser just because I think that the child should have written what it was supposed to write and not write their personal opinions in there?

The Nazis were just following instructions, and look where that got them.

Why not? You think that a child is going to have problems in life because he said hitting dogs is wrong, rather than answering the question. Now, all of a sudden YOU don't like radical generalizations? Oh, the irony is sweet. Like I said, you can't complain if this all backfires.

Okay, so I'm nazi and an animal abuser just because I think that the child should rather write the answer then personal opinion. Aren't you a psychologist? Because it requires some serious skills to know some person's personality just from few words.

Actually, I'm a law student (don't know about everyone else here) so I'm used to arguing in debates. So no, not a psychologist but I am very flattered. All aside, I think that you're statements are hypocritical, as I previously mentioned in my last message. For some reason, you've decided to ignore that by continuing to spout MORE hypocritical statements. Thus, I am at a loss with your LOGIC (literally facepalmed when I read them), that is to say, there is none. Take Cicero's word on this, he is the greatest orator to ever have lived for a reason "est proprium stultitiae aliorum vitia cernere, oblivisci suorum." That's all I have to say, it is a humbling sentiment that I always carry with me. Perhaps you should too.

Seec, you subservient bastard.