I got yelled at for thinking guys shouldn't have to do the second one. The first one is kind of a jerk move, but it isn't. He had to jump over it, and unless she's short she can too. And the third one is sweet.
But the second one, if his jacket is wet there's nothing be can offer you to keep you warm later on.
Also, that's his jacket it probably cost a lot of money. Just walk your ass around the puddle or take your shoes off and walk through it. It's water it's not gonna hurt.
The first one is rude and stupid, because she's probably gonna hurt herself. Hell if the dude did the same thing it's dumb, you shouldn't jump in the water like that you'll slip and break some ankle
▼Reply
deleted
· 9 years ago
The second one seems kind of unconventional for the guy. I just hope whoever they do that for is worth it.
the second one is stupid period. the water will soak through and still get her shoes wet not to mention getting the coat dirty and soaking wet. I'd only do that if i was rich enough to throw the coat away in the nearest garbage bin afterwords. The third option is the best one. anyone that tries to argue for the second one is just a delusional romanticist that knows that will never happen to them in their lifetime.
But the second one, if his jacket is wet there's nothing be can offer you to keep you warm later on.