For you, is it art or vandalism?
9 years ago by sowhatever · 1639 Likes · 34 comments · Popular
Report
Comments
Follow Comments Sorted by time
guest
· 9 years ago
· FIRST
Graffiti art, when its in an appropriate location. Not like on the side of a church or something.
21
guest
· 9 years ago
***Graffiti is art
deleted
· 9 years ago
Depends on if the owner of the building likes having it there / consented to it
32
deleted
· 9 years ago
Vandalism :I
10
smbadat
· 9 years ago
Art :|
6
stream_42
· 9 years ago
What are you talking about? This is obviously a genius' masterpiece!
2
daniel696
· 9 years ago
For me, It's interesting, i'll tell you that much.
10
·
Edited 9 years ago
ecumenicalmatter
· 9 years ago
If they had permission it's art, if not it's vandalism
33
taratheartist
· 9 years ago
Artistic vandalism
5
thatguyyouknow
· 9 years ago
I think it's pretty cool
2
guest
· 9 years ago
Both. Art that placed somewhere without the consent of the place's owner is vandalism, but that doesn't reduce its artistic qualities.
16
dailydoseofmusic
· 9 years ago
^ this
4
guest
· 9 years ago
^ that
3
smbadat
· 9 years ago
Stuff^
3
garlog
· 9 years ago
This. It's so fucking obvious. I'm baffled by people's inability to accept/realize that these two things are not mutually exclusive.
1
zardmalije
· 9 years ago
Art
guest
· 9 years ago
Its art and I'm arthead
runner
· 9 years ago
It's doodles
1
dailydoseofmusic
· 9 years ago
Still art.
guest
· 9 years ago
If its without the consent of the owner of the property, it is vandalism.
barcode
· 9 years ago
Art, always.
garlog
· 9 years ago
Unless it's just some bullshit on a wall.
barcode
· 9 years ago
Well I think of art as creative ways people can express themselves and a reflection of who they are and how they feel. Some people's art are just better than others, but who are we really to judge one person's art to another's. But hopefully it's not just some bullshit on a wall, I think this in particular is art. You can tell it was thought out and kinda funny.
Show All
garlog
· 9 years ago
Yeah, sure, this one specifically is art, but you made it sound like everything is art, which is silly.
smbadat
· 9 years ago
Art is in the eye of the beholder
1
barcode
· 9 years ago
Exactly, there is no solid definition for art so art can be almost whatever. Not all art is for everyone though, even with everything I said I'm not particularly fond of a lot of modern art. Some of it's good but I find most of it kind of not that great but that's just my opinion.
garlog
· 9 years ago
That's a pretty lame definition of art, but I suppose anyone can think something looks cool.
barcode
· 9 years ago
You think that "creative ways people can express themselves and a reflection of who they are and how they feel" is a lame definition of art? Well ok that's your opinion.
garlog
· 9 years ago
No, I was referring to "there is no solid definition for art so art can be almost whatever."
barcode
· 9 years ago
Well it can be, it's however they express themselves.
barcode
· 9 years ago
We're obviously we're not going to come to an agreement on this and this conversation is going nowhere so I'm going to stop replying. But I thank you for having an actual conversation instead of just trying to put me down with slurs and offensive language. Good day
·
Edited 9 years ago
guest
· 9 years ago
Depends who's buldi it is if it's theres its art
guest
· 9 years ago
Theirs*
zipthesilver
· 8 years ago
Depends on consent.