Just look at the person you are supporting...... Should speak for itself. And yeah, it's not like there are any really good ones to pick from but this one is the worst. Think about it: he's gonna start mocking and commenting about other countries as a president and make more enemies... Some of them could've been our own allies or even strategic partners before. Talk about Mexico, talk about China... Things could get bigger and soon you'd have the UK on that list. Those simple things like what you see in this post... How immature and how wrong is it to mock a disabled person? If this doesn't make you think "what is this guy doing? Who does he think he is?" Then I don't know what will....
In our defense, after years of being allies, one asshole president shouldn't destroy relationships. He could probably blow us all up in nuclear war because he keeps calling Kim Jong an idiot, but at least that'll be okay because we'll be out of that h***-hole of this world.
Oh yes Obama. Who other countries leaders don't despise like the do Trump. Trump is banned from ever entering England. Obama who throughout the 8 years he was in office tried to make more allies with countries that don't particularly like us because he wanted peace among the two. Obama who while Trump was making fun of a disabled reporter was feeding homeless veterans and has tried to pass bills to help the same homeless veterans but the Republican party in Congress turned down every single one. That Obama?
3
deleted
· 8 years ago
I'm not sure why he was mentioned or if it was directed at me soooo I'm staying out of this
True. There are no decent candidates tbh. But this guy is going really far... And i mean REALLY far. Somehow Trump has managed to gain supporters, it's not just a joke anymore. If you know Hitler's rise to power in detail.... It's exactly what Trump is doing... He's being ENDORSED by none else than the Ku Klux Klan (KKK)...
It's no longer a joke, this man is a danger to the country and to the world.
The people posting shit about killing JB and his fans is messed up.
It's one thing to dislike, and another to hate, but to say that you want to murder someone for the sole reason that they like something you don't, is gross and inappropriate.
That moment when the fucking kkk can endorse Jesus or Clinton or fucking Doritos because they have free will. That doesn't mean he endorses the kkk or supports them. If you're going to dislike the guy, cool, but have a good argument besides the one that "he hates Mexicans" or that the "kkk endorses him," as both are biased things skewed to your agenda.
Well he called all Mexicans that enter the United States Rapist and that they're bringing their drugs, that sounds like their is some hate behind that considering it's a very broad untrue statement.
He never said they were ALL criminals. He said there were criminals among them. We had reports out the ass of these poor little immigrants getting assaulted on their way to break our immigration laws and he pointed out that if illegals are getting raped on the way, SOMEONE must be raping them!
Dude, the stuff he said wasn't even true. More white people have been arrested for drug crimes than mexicans. More crimes in general are actually from white criminals than mexican criminals.
That is an awful argument. You're completely ignoring all of the points anyone has brought up just because you have a distaste for trump. People are cheating the system and coming to the us illegally. Are you aware of how much a legal immigrant has to go through? They earned citizenship. Not the illegal immigrants. If they want to become legal, law abiding citizens, cool, if not, they need to leave. Furthermore, crime IS coming through that border. Believe it or not, Hispanics and whites both illegally immigrate and both illegally brings drugs and perform violent crimes. You're biased, uninformed, and imagining that Mexico is a great country. It's riddled with crime, poverty and drugs and they bring all of that to the us everyday.
"all of the points anyone has brought up" you mean just guestwho because they are the only one who has said anything about what we're talking about. "Believe it or not, Hispanics and whites both illegally immigrate and both illegally brings drugs and perform violent crimes" I know that's why I said that there are white criminals and mexican criminals. I was never denying that. "You're biased, uninformed, and imagining that Mexico is a great country. It's riddled with crime, poverty and drugs and they bring all of that to the us everyday." Show me in my comment where I am biased. I know they bring drugs I never said they didn't. Trump is just saying flat out that they bring drugs and rape people and perform crimes. Which they do (not just hispanic people though) but he's saying it in a way to rally people against a common enemy. And he didn't even address that white criminals do in fact make up more of the people convicted of drug crimes.
"When Mexico sends it's people they're not sending their best. They're rapist, they're killers...and I assume some of them are good people." He nevers says illegal immigrants and just treats mexicans as a whole.
All people such as yourself have against trump is that he is a "racist" and hates "Mexicans" (TIL Mexican is a race. I think the world y'all are searching for us bigot or nationalist.) that, or some ignorant comment about him starting a labor camp or something. That's like 75% of the 'liberal' opinion rn. Everyone hears 'free college' and gets all wet, yet they'll go get a lib arts degree or some useless shit and be a bump on a sore ass. I am not paying for you to go to college. My wife and I come first. Sorry. I'm willing to help anyone. I enlisted to help everyone with ease, but I'm not paying even more taxes for a lazy ass when I get shit compensation for what we all go through as is. I'm sure I'm not the only person with this logic in their head, too. Back on topic, that's all it is. Biased liberals and inbetweeners spreading false truth and mud so thick you'd think it was stone because that's the popular thing on the Internet. I guess that's no biggie, he's still winning.
Well apart from him posing as an aggressive nationalist, the main issues with this this man are that he's a compulsive liar (remember the "thousands of NJ muslims celebrating the 9/11 attacks"? Many of his "factual statements" are lies when you look at them closely), he is telling journalists and politicians who are against him, they "will see what's going to happen", he is agitating his followers to threaten and even abuse journalists and opponents during his rallies, he's fine with that ending in direct physical violence, he is proposing to kill innocent families of terrorists, he is advocating torture, he's appreciating votes from racists (surely the KKK will qualify as such) and likes to post "interesting quotes" by Benito Mussolini, the inventor of trademark fascism. And thats not nearly all. The last politician in an (up to then) democratic county with this type of agenda had an even more ridiculous haircut, and was - funny enough - best dictator buddy with Mussolini.
He will weasel out of this because anyone who at this stage is still a supporter of this man does not give an actual flying fuck about the us constitution, basic human rights, truth or moral at all.
Did Trump say "a few muslims celebrated on roof tops". No, he didn't. What. He. Said. Was. A. Big. Fat. Lie. And you can cry all you want to, it won't change a thing. Also there are still no real records, but some oral reports given years later. Thats worth a shit.
Stating "thousands" when it was "hundreds" does not make it a lie. Have you never said anything like "everybody at school is stupid" or "I'm hungry enough to eat a horse"? Does the fact that you would not be able to eat an entire horse make you a liar? The cold hard fact is that there were Muslims celebrating and it was documented. I sure don't know what mental deficiency you have to say there are no records when I supplied some. Those were only the first I found. It's not hard to check if you are smart enough to use the interwebs. Never mind, sorry I assumed too much of you.
Wow. So this one (1) guy says there were "tens of thousands of people, all over the world, celebrating, and several of them were in New York and New Jersey". Where are police reports of even "hundreds" ? How many is "several"? Maybe the dozens here and there, on rooftops, in muslim hoods, that are on file? Where's the fucking beef? And even if Trump had managed to see them all personally (as there are no filmed records), why did he L!I!E! about thousands (lie!) of them on the streets (lie!) watched by him (lie!)?
I am not astonished you would take that for proof Trump's not been lying here, knowing your research competence from when it comes to socialism vs. democratic socialism vs. national socialism. You're just the kind of guy who "doubts" climate change because "several" scientists speak out against it.
The actual amount has absolutely no bearing on whether it happened or not. I fully agree Trump exaggerates and is a blow hard, but the lack of a definitive headcount does not make him a liar.
And PS: try to stay focused here, we're discussing Trump at this time.
And you don't see a slight difference between some dude who "could eat a horse" and a fucking presidential candidate agitating against a large religious group of people by lying about him having seen (lie!) thousands (lie!) of them on the street (lie!) celebrating 9/11? Suits you.
Yeah putting (lie!) every few words reinforces your point.
I understand you have difficulty following logic, but I'll try to speak slowly. The question is whether a Trump exaggeration equals a lie, not how a proven fact magically becomes racist agitation (BTW islam is a religion, not a race, I only use the term because it has become a meme).
And at any rate, if they are begin agitated as you say, they must have violent tendencies right?
When someone can only have seen a few (which itself is very, very unlikely) and says he's seen thousands, and just keeps on ignoring the complete absence of back up for this, then yes, its a lie. How hard is that? Here we are with the rhetoric questions again...
Easy, because there isn't. You can cry and bite the carpet all you want: no thousands of muslim parading the streets. I get how you ignore this fact. You can't help it.
Your inability to get past the whole "thousands" thing appears to be a pathological defect. It doesn't matter how many Muslims were celebrating. There were Muslims celebrating. There were more than just a few. There is proof. I gave you proof.
I truly believe you really think that you did. But you didn't. You just don't have the capacity to see that. So don't get too exited. You should get some sleep.
Here's the thing guest. Trump will not do an other holocaust. He CANNOT do an other holocaust. We won't let him. He doesn't have the power. He would surely be assassinated if he ever tried some shit. The man has at least the common sense to not even attempt to do what Hitler did. If you ACTUALLY believe that trump will be just like hitler, then you're dumb as hell man
Don't question him... Or you're next in the hit list...
This world needs a little fear!
(In kidding, if I was a dictator, I'd be awesome, give out free pizza and shit)
Eh... I don't agree with demon_razgriz (even though he's most likely kidding)...
But it isn't fear... It's awareness before what we fear actually happens... It's to prevent.
What's worse yet is that you're a biased idiot.. Labor camps? Are you fucking kidding? Y'all are just anti-trump because it's the 'popular' thing now. I'm not even pro-trump, but this fad is hellaciously childish.
Yea sorry, forgive my bigheaded arrogance finding irony in your complaining about the poor state of the education system in an incomplete sentence. Vote Drumpf, he's got the best humor and the best grammar.
You are forgiven, I guess. In my defense though, there is really no irony in my phone's keyboard dropping a word that I probably fat fingered when the rest of my post, and previous ones, were written correctly.
Actually I am gaining some confidence all might end sort of well. Drumpf is not really at his best and wittiest when confronted by an intelligent woman, so chances are pretty good he's going to completely blow his top in a 1 on 1 debate. Also I honestly don't believe that a majority of US americans are the kind of imbecile redneck mongrels or fucked up psycho cynics who might vote Drumpf.
That Megyn Kelly is not the dumbest girl under the sun. I bet it doesn't even take an intelligent woman, any woman who is not a prostitute asking him how he wants it done should be sufficient to irritate him.
Hillary may be a devious lying bitch, but she's way more smart and upright than Drumpf. He will probably lose his shit when she confronts him in a public debate worse than Mary Jensens brother when Ted Stroehmann touched his headphones for the first time.
Right at first, but she cannot debate or even speak well publicly. She would end up screeching or even barking! Trump is not a great debater either, but he can dazzle the unwashed masses with glittering bullshit.
She never lost her shit like he's doing every other day, and by that I mean coming across like soneone with a serious mental condition or after aweekend coke binge
She is actually pretty intelligent just according to people who have spent time with her. But yeah Trump has a knack for appealing to the idiotic masses and has that showmanship already.
Also I cannot really see a supporter of Rubio, Cruz, Jeb! or Carson vote Drumpf in the end, whereas probably every Sanders supporter will vote Clinton to avoid to Bogey Rug.
Now here you go making sense. The other Republican candidates are mostly getting ideological votes-that is, their supporters truely believe in the principles they espouse. Trump's votes are coming from all over the spectrum since his speeches have bounced all over the spectrum.
As the field narrows the other candidates, Cruz and Rubio particularly, are picking up anti-Trump votes. Trump is leading but most of his supporters are not Republicans. I just don't know if enough candidates will drop out soon enough for their voters to band together around a candidate who is not Trump soon enough to edge him out.
If he actually helps EVERYONE, not just letting the rich get richer but helping the poor and homeless and making healthcare a lot better. If he actually does some good. Then I will be shocked and will personally shake his hand, no I don't want to touch him, I'll say cool with a thumbs up to him.
Sorry, I can't freaking stand Colbert. I am not defending Trump and I do not even support him, just showing he has refuted this claim. Either way it is what it is.
Still saw Colbert and stopped it, sorry. I already know Trump has contradicted himself several times. He has also changed his message depending who his audience is, and has alternated between sounding like a rock-ribbed conservative to sounding exactly like Hillary, Pelosi, Reid, etc.
This is why I say people that claim to disagree with what he stands for are liars and haters; because NO ONE can be sure what the man stands for. About the ONLY thing he has said that hasn't changed is he's gonna build a wall and make Mexico pay for it. I don't think even his most rabid followers really believe he can make Mexico pay, but I guess it sounds good.
Some things his detractors say about him are valid, some are not. I AM NOT A TRUMP SUPPORTER. It's just I am also not a hater, and I like to get to the truth no matter who it is.
Honestly, I'm HOPING this entire election is just a very well played game of "Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain." Who's really parading these idiots? Is America Really THIS much of a joke?
Guy's are fucking morons. There's nothing he can do. If he becomes president he will fail and people will watch him fail. If you're threatened by him you need help.
Finding this thread on random is a stark reminder on why this nation needs President Trump.
To this day, Coastal and European elites continue to demonstrate that America needs to put her own interests first. Especially if that pisses off the sort of people that would wish death on a lawfully elected President who has only improved his nation and further advanced her wellbeing and prosperity.
*democratic socialist
You can see it one way and compare it to 1939 or you can see it another way, see this as not a guy trying to invade a bunch of countries, and see as the world in 2016
I don't care about whatever little aesthetic makes you people think there is a difference, he wants to make everyone pay for everyone else, and that makes him exactly the person my father and grandfather fought against.
Oh really I wasn't aware that Bernie was planning on starving the people of his nation or rounding up millions of specific people and killing them. Oh wait that's who your father and grandfather really fought against.
You're thinking National Socialist @banana. Hitler added "national" because he didn't want to be compared to Stalin, not because there is some magical difference. Socialism is socialism is socialism. And Hitler was an amateur. 5 million Jews? Ha; chump change. Stalin killed 20-60 million. Any idea where dear sweet little old Mr Sanders went on his honeymoon? I'll give you a hint: it rhymes with "Soviet Russia".
Look guestwho, if you're not willing to inform yourself just a little on he topic of national socialism in comparison to socialism, that's fine, why should you? But then, why don't you shut the fuck up instead of spreading this braindead nonsense? Why blabber along, when you clearly have not invested two fucking minutes?
Wow aren't you just a hateful kinda bastard? Why is it when you leftists get confronted with something that contradicts your fragile little opinions you people resort to hate and bile? You are wrong, wrong, wrong, my friend. Sorry to make you cry. Socialism is socialism. If you have some kind of evidence, present it. You would still be wrong but at least you would be behaving like an intelligent human being. Try putting as much effort into coming up with an adult response as you do in coming up with insults and you might grow up to make something of yourself.
That's kinda like "What? The square root of 9 ain't no carrot? If you have some kind of evidence, present it!" Ever heard of political sciences? The science of history? Or rhetorical questions?
You know, in the olden days, internet trolls would put some effort into their shtick. They would try to pretend they had an idea of what they're talking about. Kids like you just imitate ignorant, clueless chatterboxes like Bill O'Reilly, in their complete rejection of facts and findings and their totally unjustified belief in their own competency. Bill has at least studied a children's version of the bible and a couple of Reader's Digest. You're even too fucking lazy to google shit. Seriously, just shut up or restrain yourself to unsavory fratboy jokes.
Why the aggravation? Because, contrary to widespread belief, stupidity actually DOES hurt. Just not the stupid..
Just saying "socialism is socialism" isn't proving anything either you know. If you can't even tell that they're called two different things for a reason.
Yes they are two different phrases (not different things) for a reason. The reason is that "socialism" still has negative connotations, and very rightly so. By slipping an innocent little modifier in there (who could possibly be against something that's democratic? Hell America was built on democracy, right?) it softens the blow and helps seduce a generation too young to understand what their forebears fought against. Just 15 or 20 years ago the term was a death knell for liberals; now more and more are openly embracing both the ideology and label. Full-fledged socialism is insidious and has been creeping in around the edges of society for more than a century, and essentially HAS NOT CHANGED since Marx.
Try to look at it this way; what Sanders and every socialist wants to do is take whatever money you manage to earn from you, and "give" you a few things you would have been able to get yourself if you were allowed to keep your own money.
You still haven't taken the maximum two minutes necessary to find out how terribly, utterly, embarrassingly wrong you are, and how exorbitantly stupid and breathtakingly ignorant this makes you look. Thanks a lot for all this.
I think definitions are in order, because many people seem to not understand what words actually mean:
Socialism is the idea that equal distribution in the ownership of the means of production should be established. That means that socialists believe that the more widespread and equitable the ownership of the means of production is throughout society, the more sustainable, the more plural, and the more harmonious the society will ultimately be. Some socialists believe existing democratic institutions are the best vehicle for achieving that goal. Some socialists believe it can be achieved through smaller organizations and grassroots efforts. This term is all too often confused with either Fascism or Communism.
Fascism is the idea that corporate interests alone should be the wielders of state power (not workers or other disenfranchised or intermediate groups). Along with this belief, Fascism was also historically marked by extreme patriotism and national identity politics (as well
as Puritan ideas about "cleanliness" and "decency").
Communism is the idea that all means of production should be shared completely in common: No land or natural resource ownership for individuals beyond personal affects.
Capitalism is the idea that all the means of production should be owned strictly by private persons or private organizations: nothing is shared in common.
Now certainly - as I often see many people do - some distinctions can be drawn between iterations of Socialism and Communism. However, they are not one and the same. Likewise, very similar distinctions can be drawn between Capitalism and Fascism (although I very rarely hear folks making that distinction in this country). Again, not necessarily the same.
True, Stalinist Russia was not what Marx envisioned. However, he laid the groundwork and basic ideas. My only point was that the term capitalism was his invention. Of course, the rabid industrialists and robber barons of his day probably did warrant a search for alternatives, but regulation took care of the issues of the day. Socialism was kinda like throwing the baby out with the bath water and, of course, it mutated into the kind of place where Marx probably would have indeed been executed.
I would just like to say that IF Trump was actually mocking this particular reporter, so fucking what!
Why is some guy with a disability some sort of god that is untouchable? You people here love to mock Trump for whatever stupid reasons you can think of, so what if he mocks someone. You also love to mock other users who misspell a post, or use "too" instead of "to".
Someone's hair, someone's accent, someone's religious beliefs, someone's political views are all fair game for you self-righteous pricks. You can dish it out but you refuse to take it. Grow up.
That's very fair,
But if you can't walk, and someone that wants to be the president is making fun of you for it, then at least one person is gonna make a deal out of it. I'm not sure what you expect.
True, and I don't think making fun of someone for something that is beyond their control is ever really cool. I just don't see this as any different than making fun of anyone else for anything else. For instance, how many posts have there been here where the discussion has involved a creation vs big bang argument; no one ever gets upset if someone who was raised religious and doesn't believe what Bill Nye says about evolution gets mocked in the comments. The double standards and sometimes outright hatred and intolerance just irritate me. I don't only refer to FS, but society in general.
Perhaps I'm feeling a little more agitated tonight than usual, due to other things happening.
"Someone's hair, someone's accent, someone's religious beliefs, someone's political views" - all of this is personal choice. Being physically disabled is mostly not. You "just don't see this as any different"? This reminds me of why I have this certain opinion about you.
It's no longer a joke, this man is a danger to the country and to the world.
It's one thing to dislike, and another to hate, but to say that you want to murder someone for the sole reason that they like something you don't, is gross and inappropriate.
He just wants to get rid of the illegals.
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3369705/Was-Trump-Police-officer-says-pockets-Muslims-celebrated-9-11-shouted-Allahu-Akbar.html&ved=0ahUKEwjFxczP767LAhUE-mMKHR2DAfkQFggfMAE&usg=AFQjCNHicv6OqG4642Wy5tIqmJa_nrF3uw&sig2=ihLNUrPVJUlgd3kpIsT-ug
And
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=http://nypost.com/2015/12/21/nj-police-captain-says-some-muslims-did-celebrate-on-911/&ved=0ahUKEwjFxczP767LAhUE-mMKHR2DAfkQFggqMAQ&usg=AFQjCNF5BMsezerzu6KhQ7I37gXv_xTrJQ&sig2=QzlGe7Jr85L-OQ6JyfTRuA
Facts are stubborn things.
The second point is: so freakin what if it was Mussolini. Just because someone did something some people don't like does not mean that person can never be talked about or referenced or quoted. What, if I even say the word "Hitler" does that mean I worship him? In that case Hillary is vile excrement because she has not only quoted Chairman Mao, she has explicitly said she admires him.
I am not astonished you would take that for proof Trump's not been lying here, knowing your research competence from when it comes to socialism vs. democratic socialism vs. national socialism. You're just the kind of guy who "doubts" climate change because "several" scientists speak out against it.
And PS: try to stay focused here, we're discussing Trump at this time.
I understand you have difficulty following logic, but I'll try to speak slowly. The question is whether a Trump exaggeration equals a lie, not how a proven fact magically becomes racist agitation (BTW islam is a religion, not a race, I only use the term because it has become a meme).
And at any rate, if they are begin agitated as you say, they must have violent tendencies right?
Yeah huh!
This world needs a little fear!
(In kidding, if I was a dictator, I'd be awesome, give out free pizza and shit)
But it isn't fear... It's awareness before what we fear actually happens... It's to prevent.
But what's worse is I can see someone like trump setting up labour camps...
*edit: there you go@funsubstanceuser
As the field narrows the other candidates, Cruz and Rubio particularly, are picking up anti-Trump votes. Trump is leading but most of his supporters are not Republicans. I just don't know if enough candidates will drop out soon enough for their voters to band together around a candidate who is not Trump soon enough to edge him out.
Here, see for yourself.
Here's the video if anyone wants to see.....
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/donald-trump-making-fun-reporters-disability/story?id=35463888
This is why I say people that claim to disagree with what he stands for are liars and haters; because NO ONE can be sure what the man stands for. About the ONLY thing he has said that hasn't changed is he's gonna build a wall and make Mexico pay for it. I don't think even his most rabid followers really believe he can make Mexico pay, but I guess it sounds good.
Some things his detractors say about him are valid, some are not. I AM NOT A TRUMP SUPPORTER. It's just I am also not a hater, and I like to get to the truth no matter who it is.
To this day, Coastal and European elites continue to demonstrate that America needs to put her own interests first. Especially if that pisses off the sort of people that would wish death on a lawfully elected President who has only improved his nation and further advanced her wellbeing and prosperity.
Doesn't matter what other words you mix in there, it's still a bad thing bro.
You can see it one way and compare it to 1939 or you can see it another way, see this as not a guy trying to invade a bunch of countries, and see as the world in 2016
You know, in the olden days, internet trolls would put some effort into their shtick. They would try to pretend they had an idea of what they're talking about. Kids like you just imitate ignorant, clueless chatterboxes like Bill O'Reilly, in their complete rejection of facts and findings and their totally unjustified belief in their own competency. Bill has at least studied a children's version of the bible and a couple of Reader's Digest. You're even too fucking lazy to google shit. Seriously, just shut up or restrain yourself to unsavory fratboy jokes.
Why the aggravation? Because, contrary to widespread belief, stupidity actually DOES hurt. Just not the stupid..
Try to look at it this way; what Sanders and every socialist wants to do is take whatever money you manage to earn from you, and "give" you a few things you would have been able to get yourself if you were allowed to keep your own money.
Socialism is the idea that equal distribution in the ownership of the means of production should be established. That means that socialists believe that the more widespread and equitable the ownership of the means of production is throughout society, the more sustainable, the more plural, and the more harmonious the society will ultimately be. Some socialists believe existing democratic institutions are the best vehicle for achieving that goal. Some socialists believe it can be achieved through smaller organizations and grassroots efforts. This term is all too often confused with either Fascism or Communism.
Fascism is the idea that corporate interests alone should be the wielders of state power (not workers or other disenfranchised or intermediate groups). Along with this belief, Fascism was also historically marked by extreme patriotism and national identity politics (as well
Communism is the idea that all means of production should be shared completely in common: No land or natural resource ownership for individuals beyond personal affects.
Capitalism is the idea that all the means of production should be owned strictly by private persons or private organizations: nothing is shared in common.
Now certainly - as I often see many people do - some distinctions can be drawn between iterations of Socialism and Communism. However, they are not one and the same. Likewise, very similar distinctions can be drawn between Capitalism and Fascism (although I very rarely hear folks making that distinction in this country). Again, not necessarily the same.
Capitalism would work a lot better if it wasn't infused with corporatism like it is in America now.
Why is some guy with a disability some sort of god that is untouchable? You people here love to mock Trump for whatever stupid reasons you can think of, so what if he mocks someone. You also love to mock other users who misspell a post, or use "too" instead of "to".
Someone's hair, someone's accent, someone's religious beliefs, someone's political views are all fair game for you self-righteous pricks. You can dish it out but you refuse to take it. Grow up.
But if you can't walk, and someone that wants to be the president is making fun of you for it, then at least one person is gonna make a deal out of it. I'm not sure what you expect.
Perhaps I'm feeling a little more agitated tonight than usual, due to other things happening.