The last two are actually legitament concerns. If someone has a gluten allergy they can't eat the bread. If the fish has really high levels of mercury then it's dangerous.
The thing about that gluten stuff is that the majority of "anti-gluten" people are only doing it because it became a trend or they where told it's bad for you even though it's healthy. Now, I'm not saying there aren't people that are allergic to it.
And the Vegan can still eat bread (unless my understanding of how bread is made is wrong). Also notice how the Vegan is in the overwhelming minority, being one out of possibly hundreds.
So the logical thing to do is just assume that the person is just riding on an anti gluten trend? Also I think you're mistaken on the point of the majority of that movement just being a trend, and would like to point out that just because someone is the loudest doesn't mean they're the most representative.
I think the vegan was talking about the fish. Either way i guess it can be viewed that way, but I'm pretty sure the comic is talking about how in modern day that even if they're starving they would refuse food just to (depending on if the person is legitimate) feel superior.
I think if they were legit starving, then they would loosen their principles. Hell I would, and everyone I know probably would, and so would the overwhelming majority of people in this world would change their minds if it was a legitament life or death scenario. They may hate themselves afterward, but in the moment all you care about is living
As someone with celiac, I can say that if I was starving I would eat the bread. It would be painful, and I would want to be dead, but it's better than starving and actually being dead. Also, if it was the same bread from 2000 years ago, it would probably be okay. It's a different kind of wheat.
*leaves* Y'all motherfuckers can starve
And it's frikkin Jesus magicking up the food, I think it would be pretty damn pure.