No,it's because you were ignorant and misrepresented furries,not to mention the fact that you bullied others repeatedly and told them to commit suicide.
First I insulted furries. Second, I told someone to consider committing suicide after they repeatedly did retarded shit. Third, I posted what came up after I searched up 'Furry'. Fourth, I got in an argument with bookhoarder, in which they committed an atrociously stupid logical fallacy and I called them out on it. Realizing that they were about to get destroyed, they turned tail and ran, ignoring my direct question multiple times. I then got banned because the admins saw that you reported everything I said. You probably feel super proud that you got me banned, though as you can see, it was not that effective. Anyway, respond with whatever you want, I won't continue this, cuz its a hassle to make a new account. (Jk it's really really easy)
I only reported the comments in which you told people to kill themselves. Besides if you hadn't said that,then you wouldn't have been banned. Simple as that. And like I said before: you don't belong here. You're a bully,and bullies don't belong here.
I said I was done here, but I think it's ok insult whoever the fuck you want. I'll be fine if you tell me that people who find enjoyment in coming back to funsubstance after they've been banned (me) are disgusting freaks who deserve to die. If I'm mentally sound, I wouldn't care what you think anyway. So, I think everyone is fair game on the internet. It's not like I'm going out and clubbing them or anything.
But I will.
I do in fact believe that my question was a legal, correct one; you are adamant in the fact that you and man are separate people.
But yet you can only provide 5 facts to prove the matter.
Why can't you give 10 without spewing out a paragraph of saying why I have to give 10 billion reasons why I'm not autistic? To me, it seems like you're trying to avoid the questions. I'd like the other 5 that you've yet to answer please.
Edit: and, if you can't provide them, it only proves to me and everyone else here that you are on a sinking ship, scrambling to break free of your past.
Ok, then. Give me 5 reasons, then another 5 reasons as to why 1 + 1 = 2. It's something really obvious, and doesn't need too many explanations. In fact, giving 10 non-synonymous explanations for this thing can be difficult. However, not being able to give 10 reasons as to why 1+1 = 2, does not mean that 1+1 doesn't equal 2. So, just because I can't give some arbitrarily large amount of reasons as to why I am not man, does not mean that I am man.
Sure, we have the freedom to insult whoever we want. It's when you start insulting groups when things get hairy. ;)
See, now you're forming judgements about large numbers of people without knowing a thing about them individually. It's foolish at best, and can lead to verbal/physical abuse, dehumanization, and war, at worst.
But hey, you're free to exercise your freedoms for Freedom's sake, Shades McCoolswag.
In response to your edit: if I was trying to break free of my past, I would not act in a way that is comparable to how man acts. Also, I would not admit that I respect him, which I do. Again, your choice of the number 10 is completely arbitrary. What makes 10 reasons more valuable than 5? Why didn't you ask for 20 reasons? Read my explanation above. Can you tell me specifically 10 DISTINCT reasons as to why you are not, for example, rwby_rose? Anyway, although my above claims are completely justified and explained, someone as unintelligent as you will also need the following:
6. Man used a different ban evasion method: he used different emails
7. Man would get banned instantly regardless of his name/account simply due to being able to be tracked through IP.
8. Man distinctly specified that he didn't use any IP changers or VPNs, I do.
9. Man was far less moderate than I, and would start fights on his own volition. Unlike him, the arguments I cause start based on someone else's
(continued, just in case you can't understand that) Post or comment.
10. Man would post original content, created by himself using Photoshop, while I post images I find online.
@matthewg I'm not exercising my freedom for freedoms sake, I'm just stating what I believe. Also, unlike some fools here, I realize that comments on a tiny image sharing website don't have ANY impact on the world, and anyone who lets something from this site affect their real lives are really really stupid.
Actually things have cooled down considerably, especially since @bookhoarder can't respond at all now that I not only explained the flaw in his logic AND provided 5 extra reasons (although I had no obligation to). It's basically a checkmate rn.
10 reasons as to why I am not rwby_rose? Okay.
1. We have two different typing styles.
2. We have two different posting styles; usually I post 4chan, and I did post a Futurama picture. Aside from that, I haven't posted in over a year.
3. When I do post, it's less often than her. She posts at least once per day. When was the last time I posted something? Not today.
4. The majority of her comments are just all-caps comments saying "NEVER" and the like.
5. A lot of the things she says are different from me. We talk about two separate things.
6. I've never posted anything about furries, or even clung to the clan.
7. I've never said anything about RWBY. Maybe something about Rooster Teeth, but not the RWBY show on YouTube.
8. I was harassed on this website for a year. If RWBY was me, surely she'd be harassed too.
9. My account was banned for a year. If RWBY was me, surely shed be banned too.
10. Me and RWBY don't even agree on much. We don't TALK much. Wouldn't I be talking to myself often?
Bonus! 11: RWBY has 7,500 comments. How would we be commenting at the exact same time if we're the same person?
And since you offered, how about another 10 reasons?
You said that as if you can specify another 10; I'd like to see them.
Obviously you would act like him. You do talk a lot like him, and you did start a fight of your own volition; you commented harshly on RWBY's post. That lead to this. She didn't start anything by posting that; you started it by responding negatively, and you fueled the flames by posting furry porn and making 2 accounts to prove your point.
Not only that, but you repeatedly refuse that you're another person; that, I could believe, but you're doing what he did to stress your point. Whenever he was shut down, he made another account. You were shut down, you made another account.
You're dancing around my comment without actually responding to it, correct.
Reju, if you have something to say, please do. If not, know that your cheerleading behaviour makes you come off as nothing more than correct's lackey. You're better than that.
Maybe reju is the secret correct4.
Hey cor-reju-man, does it really matter what "autistic" furries do when the curtains are closed? Are you specifically in the bedroom, at all times, watching them yiff and yip and laugh and pounce? Because if so, that's creepy and I know now you really ARE man.
And if not, then it's none of your business. Especially since the original post that started it all was literally just a man dressed as a canine. You got so triggered over a guy in a dog suit. That's no different than someone in a Disney princess outfit. I mean, honestly, if comments on a small website don't count, then why do you think your complaining does?
Bookhoarder I specifically said you'd ask for 10 more to show how arbitrary your behaviour is, not because I easily have 10 more reasons in store. Do you know what arbitrary means? Read my example about 1+1. Also, a lot of the reasons you gave me about why you are not rwby are not hard facts but assumptions.
Reju is on your side, as far as I can tell.
I don't want him, that's for sure.
Anyway, I mean, if you are going to expect me to ask for 10 reasons and specifically say that to me, I'd expect you to be prepared to answer that. Come on, Mondale. Get it together. You've got to beat me in the reelection.
Just because you're referencing a really old election doesn't mean you're any more educated than a child who knows how to use wikipedia. Regardless, here is my statement: you have the ability to ask of me to give you as many reasons as you want. Just because I cannot give you 20,30,50,100,3000 reasons as to why I am not man, does not mean that I am man. It's a very simple concept to wrap your mind around. I am openly admitting right now that I don't have the time to come up with 20 distinct reasons as to why I am not Man. However, if you truly believe that this guarantees that I am indeed Man, then you seriously need to get an education.
@matthewg the last question you asked was: "So what you're saying is that furries are fair game and may be mistreated, simply based on the fact that they like to dress up in the bedroom?" And I answered that pretty directly. But if you don't understand my answer, here it is: furries are fair game just as any person or group is. The fact that they dress up in the bedroom (and very very often, in public and on social media) makes me target them more than say, Buddhist monks.
Who said I still believed you were him? I just like asking questions.
Anyway, I don't need to go onto Wikipedia for my jokes. The fact of the matter is that your jokes are just repeats of themselves; autistic, stupid, unintelligent, rinse, repeat. At least I actually try to provide variety. You're desperately trying to search for holes in my argument.
You dodged my question too: do you sit and watch furries have sex?
I mean really, is that any different from any other kinks? Like BDSM? Or adult diapers? What makes furries so terribly disgusting compared to people shitting themselves and then feeding it to each other?
I don't sit and watch furries have sex. However, since I know of the stupid cringe shit they do, they obviously make their kinks quite public. How do you think I even know about the existence of furries? The fact that I, a person who never intended to learn about cringy animal fuckers, did learn what furries were, makes it obvious that they DONT just keep to themselves in bed. And that they are public/open with their kinks mean that they also understand that they are open to ridicule as well. Also, I'm not separately trying to find holes in your argument, I'm just arguing with someone who refuses to use an adult mindset. How is it that you don't understand that not being able to come up with 20 distinct reasons for something does not make that thing false? Hell, Nobody can give 20 distinct reasons as to why gravity exists/works, but that doesn't mean it doesn't.
Or could the government have hidden a magnet under the earth, and everyone born has a chip implanted in their foot to keep them on the ground? You never know, man. You never know.
Well, you're not able to provide 20 distinct reasons as to why that would be the case, so that theory is out the window. Please suggest something that you can give 20 distinct and logical/verifiable reasons for.
So you're gonna play dumb and pretend I said "question" and not "comment"?
Hey, whatever allows you to cling precariously to your tender little worldview, man.
9/11 was an inside job.
Here's 17 facts: https://youtu.be/70Ce_mbY5c
Here's 16: https://youtu.be/gQEUKB1Nb4o
Here's 15 facts: https://youtu.be/zbsZjW-m0x8
Unless you can't count, that's 48. And unless you couldn't learn how to count in the time it took you to move your eyes from 48 to "and", 48 is bigger than 20.
Bam.
Okay, now you give me 48 reasons as to how you're not man.
See, you just proved your own logic faulty. If we just needed some 'fact' (even though these don't have much likelihood being facts) lists to prove something right, then I could just fake some 'facts' too. Thanks for proving my point.
"Please suggest something you can give 20 logical/verifiable facts for."
And then I do that, but I instead have 48, not 20, and it doesn't count because why?
@matthewg oh I thought it said question. While I did respond to your comment, let me make it more clear. Yes, I have the freedom to say what I want. Yes, I know that sometimes a generalization of a group can have horrible consequences (nazi Germany anyone?). HOWEVER, these horrible consequences happen when a person in power, or a person with a large audience and followed base does the generalization. A comment on funsubstance will NEVER have a significant impact on the world, so I have no qualms with insulting an entire group of people even though it is entirely possible for there to be nice furries in existence.
So if it's possible to have nice furries....why are you saying the whole group is a bunch of sexual deviants?
Especially after furries have come out to say they are NOT in that subgroup?
It's ok to be an asshole if what you say/do has no significance at all, @matthewg You can scream racial slurs at a blank wall for hours on end and it wouldn't hurt anyone, so it's fine. Anyway, there's an argument thread up in Chat so go there.
"Again, my words should be nothing more than worthless pixels to them". -correct#
If you really thought that, and weren't just feebly backpedaling, why spend time time and effort here day in and day out spouting them?
@matthewg idk if it counts as backpedalling if I always believed that anyone's words here are worthless. For example, if I cared what people here thought, I'd have left a while ago
Fyi, I didn't downthumb you, but from one dude to another, you may want to rethink your choice of profile pic. Also, taking any excuse to talk about your lifting is poor form, to use the parlance you're familiar with.
I'm sorry man i just really passion about lifting I used to be extremely fat this is all new to me being fit and stuff, thank you for the advise i will change my pic, most likley my ex or one of her lackys trying to get me off this website so they downthumb all my comments, but i like laughing here so if i get banned I'll just make a new profile and move on with my life so all that Entergy will be in vain
You guys assume, we were engaged and living together all I asked on here is that she give me my things back when I left her, then yall ganged up on me, do i really look like i need to Chase a thot
Tbh, both of them have thrown up red flags in the little time I've known them on here.
My advice...like any failure, learn everything you can from it. Also, be decent to each other. It doesn't cost you anything, and it's so much easier on everyone involved in the long run.
Thank you @reju, @rwby_rose get a life how can i stalk someone when i moved 1100 miles across state lines to get away from her smh, you just have some sad internet crush on her
Are you kidding me?? I'm an egalitarian and an MRA. I consistently stand for men's rights and due process. But one has to earn my trust regardless of gender.
Well I think they want to ban me not cuz I'm a bully, but I'm just an affront to the funsubstance way of life in general. I'm a bit too different and vocally so, so it's like a scab that won't go the fuck away. I get that they'd try to ban me.
I doubt that is it either, if you look at the chat thread I think everything is at least dormant on that front. It's probably just a few ppl who don't like you, your writing style, or your lack of enmity towards me at the moment. Just pay no heed to the downvotes, they don't mean anything. Back when you could see the downvotes, it was much better, cuz at least you could see your achievements.
Maybe you'll get to see the next shit show.
I do in fact believe that my question was a legal, correct one; you are adamant in the fact that you and man are separate people.
But yet you can only provide 5 facts to prove the matter.
Why can't you give 10 without spewing out a paragraph of saying why I have to give 10 billion reasons why I'm not autistic? To me, it seems like you're trying to avoid the questions. I'd like the other 5 that you've yet to answer please.
Edit: and, if you can't provide them, it only proves to me and everyone else here that you are on a sinking ship, scrambling to break free of your past.
See, now you're forming judgements about large numbers of people without knowing a thing about them individually. It's foolish at best, and can lead to verbal/physical abuse, dehumanization, and war, at worst.
But hey, you're free to exercise your freedoms for Freedom's sake, Shades McCoolswag.
6. Man used a different ban evasion method: he used different emails
7. Man would get banned instantly regardless of his name/account simply due to being able to be tracked through IP.
8. Man distinctly specified that he didn't use any IP changers or VPNs, I do.
9. Man was far less moderate than I, and would start fights on his own volition. Unlike him, the arguments I cause start based on someone else's
10. Man would post original content, created by himself using Photoshop, while I post images I find online.
1. We have two different typing styles.
2. We have two different posting styles; usually I post 4chan, and I did post a Futurama picture. Aside from that, I haven't posted in over a year.
3. When I do post, it's less often than her. She posts at least once per day. When was the last time I posted something? Not today.
4. The majority of her comments are just all-caps comments saying "NEVER" and the like.
5. A lot of the things she says are different from me. We talk about two separate things.
7. I've never said anything about RWBY. Maybe something about Rooster Teeth, but not the RWBY show on YouTube.
8. I was harassed on this website for a year. If RWBY was me, surely she'd be harassed too.
9. My account was banned for a year. If RWBY was me, surely shed be banned too.
10. Me and RWBY don't even agree on much. We don't TALK much. Wouldn't I be talking to myself often?
Bonus! 11: RWBY has 7,500 comments. How would we be commenting at the exact same time if we're the same person?
You said that as if you can specify another 10; I'd like to see them.
Obviously you would act like him. You do talk a lot like him, and you did start a fight of your own volition; you commented harshly on RWBY's post. That lead to this. She didn't start anything by posting that; you started it by responding negatively, and you fueled the flames by posting furry porn and making 2 accounts to prove your point.
Not only that, but you repeatedly refuse that you're another person; that, I could believe, but you're doing what he did to stress your point. Whenever he was shut down, he made another account. You were shut down, you made another account.
Reju, if you have something to say, please do. If not, know that your cheerleading behaviour makes you come off as nothing more than correct's lackey. You're better than that.
Hey cor-reju-man, does it really matter what "autistic" furries do when the curtains are closed? Are you specifically in the bedroom, at all times, watching them yiff and yip and laugh and pounce? Because if so, that's creepy and I know now you really ARE man.
And if not, then it's none of your business. Especially since the original post that started it all was literally just a man dressed as a canine. You got so triggered over a guy in a dog suit. That's no different than someone in a Disney princess outfit. I mean, honestly, if comments on a small website don't count, then why do you think your complaining does?
I don't want him, that's for sure.
Anyway, I mean, if you are going to expect me to ask for 10 reasons and specifically say that to me, I'd expect you to be prepared to answer that. Come on, Mondale. Get it together. You've got to beat me in the reelection.
Anyway, I don't need to go onto Wikipedia for my jokes. The fact of the matter is that your jokes are just repeats of themselves; autistic, stupid, unintelligent, rinse, repeat. At least I actually try to provide variety. You're desperately trying to search for holes in my argument.
I mean really, is that any different from any other kinks? Like BDSM? Or adult diapers? What makes furries so terribly disgusting compared to people shitting themselves and then feeding it to each other?
Hey, whatever allows you to cling precariously to your tender little worldview, man.
Here's 17 facts: https://youtu.be/70Ce_mbY5c
Here's 16: https://youtu.be/gQEUKB1Nb4o
Here's 15 facts: https://youtu.be/zbsZjW-m0x8
Unless you can't count, that's 48. And unless you couldn't learn how to count in the time it took you to move your eyes from 48 to "and", 48 is bigger than 20.
Bam.
Okay, now you give me 48 reasons as to how you're not man.
And then I do that, but I instead have 48, not 20, and it doesn't count because why?
Especially after furries have come out to say they are NOT in that subgroup?
If you really thought that, and weren't just feebly backpedaling, why spend time time and effort here day in and day out spouting them?
Ly.
Fuck.
Just an FYI.
https://m.funsubstance.com/fun/343121/ok-better-picture-new-job-wish-me-luck/
My advice...like any failure, learn everything you can from it. Also, be decent to each other. It doesn't cost you anything, and it's so much easier on everyone involved in the long run.
But rape is not a thing to joke about. unless it's like once every so often. like 9/11.
Thanks for reminding me to listen to some Carlin today, Bookie! :D