^^^
Digital art is still art. It still takes talent to do, still takes time, patience, and effort. You just don't have to pay hundreds and possible thousands of dollars of supplies that will eventually run out
Maybe it's a message about most modern art and how it's become meaningless, or perhaps it's about how art changes and we don't get to decide what is or isn't art. Art is whatever the artist says it is, stop being so damn pretentious and realize that just because you don't agree with something, that doesn't make it wrong.
You're defending the person who made a blue canvas with one white line going down it and called it art?
It's asinine.
You're telling me I can stop putting effort into my own artwork and just paint a big white line down a blue canvas, and that's more valuable than my other work where time and effort was actually put in?
There is a difference between art made for sale and art that's meant to be enjoyable, no rich person would buy a fantasy digital illustration no matter how skilled the artist is. Also everyone can view or copy digital art so they can only hope to sell a quantity of prints to at least get paid.
No. A white fucking line down a blank blue canvas isn't art. The person who made it isn't an artist.
Art takes skill.
It takes work And patience and talent.
Like the guy who was sweating blue? Art is subjective, he could have used a tiny brush to paint this which takes patience. But still it doesn't look like a piece of art.
I once read that this "modern art" is actually used for money laundering, and it actually makes sense, because you can sell those paintings anonymously and buy them anonymously as well
When you see a painting such as Mona Lisa to something you can find on deviantart, what do you think? Do you think purely of the feelings the piece sends out or do you value the story behind it more? I do not agree with the plue canvas with a white stripe is a piece worth anything however I can understand why some people would, or atleast, I can imagine. I believe that this modern art is supposed to send out more subtle feelings or the artist may be experimenting with our conception of art as a whole. It's something that is always very healthy for us humans to find new way to see old concepts but they are in a way, forgetting why we love art. Modern art is so obsessed with creating something new that the new thing they make lacks value, they just throw shit at the wall to see what sticks and when someone with a name for themselves do it no one (around them atleast) dares to criticize them. Atleast that's my theory.
Digital art is still art. It still takes talent to do, still takes time, patience, and effort. You just don't have to pay hundreds and possible thousands of dollars of supplies that will eventually run out
It's asinine.
You're telling me I can stop putting effort into my own artwork and just paint a big white line down a blue canvas, and that's more valuable than my other work where time and effort was actually put in?
Art takes skill.
It takes work And patience and talent.