Comments
Follow Comments Sorted by time
sincere_milkshake
· 8 years ago
· FIRST
They're disgusting people, but that would go against their human rights and people wouldn't go for it
31
·
Edited 8 years ago
thatswhatshesaid
· 8 years ago
I agree we don't need to sink to their level, just have them do their time
guest
· 8 years ago
So you'd rather have cosmetics/ meds tested on innocent animals that don't even need them. Well that's just great. Soo great.
▼
sincere_milkshake
· 8 years ago
What's wrong with you? I never said that. All I said is that it would go against their human rights. Animals don't have those sort of rights so there's nothing you can really do
4
guest
· 8 years ago
If it wasn't for falsified rape accusations, I would be all for this
20
guest
· 8 years ago
Not one for the whole "prison should be more about reformation than punishment" argument then huh?
14
aenean
· 8 years ago
..yeah, but what about people being accused falsely?
12
trustnthngmulder
· 8 years ago
Dude, my bunny (of testing species) ate its own babies. I'd sentence her to life prison but she'd probably rape everyone there.
6
deleted
· 8 years ago
add animal abusers for extra irony
8
deleted
· 8 years ago
How very compassionate!
2
guest
· 8 years ago
In America at least, we have the 8th amendment banning cruel and unusual punishments. So, sorry about that.
garlog
· 8 years ago
Maybe give them the option, so they can shave some time off their sentence or something, but forcing them to do that would definitely cruel and unusual as a punishment.
thatswhatshesaid
· 8 years ago
Nah I don't want them out on the street early, just have them do there time
1
parisqeen
· 8 years ago
They deserve no sympathy in my opinion but the law is the law and this would go against their rights. Animals shouldn't be treated like that anyway but the laws tricky
1
matthewg
· 8 years ago
Are we letting the casual rapists go, or are we using them for Taco Bell taco meat filler?
▼
thetrashman147
· 8 years ago
Oh boii
▼
