Menu
1
Popular
Trending
Fresh
All
Substances
Funsubsters
GIFs
Videos
Media
Shop
Top
Top:
Posts
Comments
Users
Chat
More
Search
Submit
Sign Up
Login
Feedback Form
Fun Blog
English Language in a Nutshell
Comments
Show More Comments
Follow Comments
Sorted by time
needmorec4
· 8 years ago
·
FIRST
I understand the first 3, but why the 4th one??
3
willfree
· 8 years ago
He had had faith. None of it had had an effect on...
9
Reply
willfree
· 8 years ago
I'll see your four hads and raise you seven more:
"James, while John had had "had," had had "had had"; "had had" had had a better effect on the teacher"
8
·
Edited 8 years ago
diciest
· 8 years ago
this one i still don't get.
4
diciest
· 8 years ago
oH I GET IT NOW
4
Reply
mialinay
· 8 years ago
Wenn Fliegen hinter fliegen fliegen, fliegen Fliegen Fliegen hinterher
6
Reply
guest
· 8 years ago
needs commas
diciest
· 8 years ago
it actually doesn't.
3
Reply
dominic
· 8 years ago
Sorry but for this to make sense there has to be a comma after the second "had."
1
Reply
trustnthngmulder
· 8 years ago
Once again... you can do this with a lot of languages. And many more. English not so special
3
Reply
huntergreen
· 8 years ago
"Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo" is a perfectly correct sentence. *drops mic and trots away*
diciest
· 8 years ago
how tho
1
Reply
pinkonwednesday
· 8 years ago
The German sentence 'Wenn Fliegen hinter Fliegen fliegen fliegen Fliegen Fliegen nach' also makes perfect sense. Fun times.
mialinay
· 8 years ago
Thanks, I already commented that one. 2 days ago.
pinkonwednesday
· 8 years ago
Sorry I seriously didn't see it... I'd appreciate my pages to load properly for once
Reply
Comments
"James, while John had had "had," had had "had had"; "had had" had had a better effect on the teacher"