'Murica

Killing in general op never specified people. Bb guns can kill.

U can do the exact same thing with an actual gun too, dumb cunt

Exactly. So just show it with a real gun then. Is there any reason not to?

And when you mention guns and death, don't you think people killing people is sort of implied?

Ever heard of hunting?

of course. I hunt hogs once a year. Are you suggesting that the josh guy is only talking about hunting? You don't think that saying a gun is solely a tool of death doesn't imply killing humans also? Seems to me most anti-gun posts do.

Are you really that daft?

I guess so but my questions still stand.

The post said "a gun is a tool of death" it may imply something more specific but the op left it very open ended. For all we know this could've been a peta supporter against guns for the sake of animals.

Since it's not specified, it's safe to assume he means people too. And in either case, my original point was that cloyd should have just used an actual firearm which can actually kill things instead of an air gun which really can't kill anything bigger that a humming bird.

And yet it can still kill. Your argument is based entirely off of what you think op meant versus what they said.

What I think op meant was that guns kill. So did everyone else, since it was so explicit. That means humans and animals included. But cloyd used a gun that can barely kill anything. It's more of a toy than a hunting tool. So I think it would have been a better post on cloyd's part if he used a gun that fires actual bullets that can really do some damage. That's it. I still don't know that you're point is.

dude can you please shut the fuck up and shoot yourself or something