Vaccines are okay. Dirty vaccines, created by huge pharmaceutical companies that only care about profit, who don't spend extra money making sure their vaccines are safe and clean, which are quickly becoming mandatory for our children, and keep increasing in number each year, are not okay. Even if a vaccines is safe and clean, its probably not a good idea to make your kids take like 10 at a time. Did you know these companies are making billions in profits from these government contracts (which comes from our taxes, btw)? They only stand to make more and more as these are pushed on us.
If they would fucking be a bit moral and ethical and make their vaccines properly, and only push the ones that are truly necessary, maybe we wouldn't be so unsure about them. Gee, so difficult to understand.
Cars are okay. Unsafe cars, created by huge car producing enterprises that only care about profit, who don't spend extra money making sure their cars are safe and clean, which are quickly becoming mandatory for our mobility, and keep increasing in number each year (3000 deaths/month only in the US), are not okay. Even if a car is safe and clean, its probably not a good idea to drive it fast or long. Did you know these companies are making billions in profits from these government contracts (which comes from our taxes, btw)? They only stand to make more and more as these are pushed on us.
If they would fucking be a bit moral and ethical and make their cars properly, and only push the ones that are truly necessary, maybe we wouldn't be so unsure about them. Gee, so difficult to understand. -Go on with guns, alcohlic beverages, cigarettes....
I agree about the cars. Tesla cars are examples of great cars.
You're an idiot if you think gun control is good. Alcohol and cigs are always bad, of course.
Ha. Thanks for the idiot. As the US are the leading nation in both possession of firearms and people being killed by firearms in the world, I don't really get your point. Fun fact: between 2004 and 2014, almost as many civilians were killed with firearms on US soil loke US soldiers during WW2 (350.000 compared to 405.000). But anyway, you will keep your guns and the rest of the world will keep watching you guys shooting each other. Each to their own.
Sorry to jump in here but numbers like that don't really mean anything to me. The US is one of the largest countries on earth land wise and has one of the largest populations as well, so if you have percent of population killed by guns compared to other countries I would be very curious to see it.
vast majority of murders in america are inner-city black on black (or hispanic gangs on anybody), two things europe largely doesnt have (oh wait, you're importing murderers by the millions now)
Regardless, as soon as a country bans guns, the amount of knifings, beatings, auto murders, etc etc increases, just look at england.
Plano, texas, might be the gun capital of the united states if you go by guns per capita, yet it has a lower murder rate than even the best european countries, whereas jamaica, where owning even a single bullet will land you in prison, has a worse gun violence rate than washington DC (which is one of our worst cities).
If you're a white gun owner in america outside of a crappy inner city area, you're in the safest demographic on earth.
Five things,
we do have criminals enough, don't you worry
the crime rate amongst refugees is just as high as in other human groups
I won't start comparing Europe or the US with Jamaika (why not Columbia or Somalia, huh)
If it is so safe in white rural areas, what do you need the guns for then?
As I said, each to their own. Living on a continent where the monopole of violence lies with the executive organs of the state and (thus?) with a lower crime rate in general makes a "culture" of gun possession almost impossible to understand.
"If it is so safe in white rural areas, what do you need the guns for then?"
Our guns are why we are safe. Consider if you were a criminal or a crazy person; who would you attack? The people who own guns, or those who don't? Which is as true for the government as it is for common criminals.
If they would fucking be a bit moral and ethical and make their vaccines properly, and only push the ones that are truly necessary, maybe we wouldn't be so unsure about them. Gee, so difficult to understand.
If they would fucking be a bit moral and ethical and make their cars properly, and only push the ones that are truly necessary, maybe we wouldn't be so unsure about them. Gee, so difficult to understand. -Go on with guns, alcohlic beverages, cigarettes....
You're an idiot if you think gun control is good. Alcohol and cigs are always bad, of course.
Regardless, as soon as a country bans guns, the amount of knifings, beatings, auto murders, etc etc increases, just look at england.
Plano, texas, might be the gun capital of the united states if you go by guns per capita, yet it has a lower murder rate than even the best european countries, whereas jamaica, where owning even a single bullet will land you in prison, has a worse gun violence rate than washington DC (which is one of our worst cities).
If you're a white gun owner in america outside of a crappy inner city area, you're in the safest demographic on earth.
we do have criminals enough, don't you worry
the crime rate amongst refugees is just as high as in other human groups
I won't start comparing Europe or the US with Jamaika (why not Columbia or Somalia, huh)
If it is so safe in white rural areas, what do you need the guns for then?
As I said, each to their own. Living on a continent where the monopole of violence lies with the executive organs of the state and (thus?) with a lower crime rate in general makes a "culture" of gun possession almost impossible to understand.
Our guns are why we are safe. Consider if you were a criminal or a crazy person; who would you attack? The people who own guns, or those who don't? Which is as true for the government as it is for common criminals.