I love the Pope so much (NSFW for slightly disfigured man)

I just like the guy, okay? The majority of the stuff he says aligns with what I believe in. I'm just trying to share a picture of him doing a good deed.
Is it wrong to like a guy that agrees with some people and disagrees with others? It's simply a nice picture that I wanted you all to see.
I'm not trying to create a debate or an argument, I'm just showing someone that I agree with doing a nice thing: embracing someone who probably hasn't felt anything like that before.

It depends. I don't know enough about him to say. All I'm doing us pointing out that your logic is flawed.

What logic? I'm posting a picture of the leader of the Catholic Church embracing a disfigured man. There is nothing to argue about here and yet, in true "third fashion", you're doing so anyway.

If you don't like him, you don't like him. That's fine, I honestly don't care.
But do you have to make an argument where there wasn't one already? I mean, I'm not even catholic and I see him as a standup guy. He isn't by any means evil or awful or anything, he promotes happiness and peace.
And no, I also don't know a lot about the guy, but I know that I like him.
"He has to have good in his heart". Most of the stuff he says and does is good. I've personally never seen anything about him criticizing trans people, and as of this comment, no one has done so yet.
Basically, third, what you're doing is spawning an argument and saying that my "logic is flawed" when nothing I've said has anything to do about that.

He embraces a disfigured man, so he has to,have good in his heart. Sounds like reasoning to me. Flawed reasoning, as I explained. And in true funsubstance fashion, you are attacking me for pointing out innacuracies/inconsistencies/flaws in your claim instead of actually listening.

Downvotes without a response, another fs classic.

I'm not saying it's simply the embracement that makes him a good guy, I'm saying that is part of my larger point.
But whatever, everyone knows you're only here to incite an argument. The website was happier when you left and it'll be even better when you do so once more. No one likes you here.
I don't understand how I'm "not listening", even though I've acknowledged, disproven and disagreed with your point. Remember when I said "If you don't like him, you don't like him"? And, "I don't care"? It still applies.
But whatever, just act as though I'm wrong without reason and don't even attempt to make an argument. You're definitely the better person.

Also, while I agree with the "downvotes without response" comment, know that I was still typing my response. I mean, I know that you're the one downvoting me, but I don't know whether you do so before or after I respond. I downvote before I make my response.

Better person? No way to tell. But it certainly looks as though I'm smarter than you. You have said nothing to address my origional point. So he's hugging the guy. First of all, this is very symbolic and all, but what does it actually do? Now my second point was actually based off misreading your comment. I thought you said "he has a good heart." Regardeless, my point still applies. As someone else says, he thinks being trans is a disease, so how would he treat them? True goodness is how you treat those who fall outside your lines and how he treats people like that is far more telling of who he is as a person.which is not to say that your wrong, just that using this to say he's a good person is total bullshit.

Fair enough. I do the same.

Sure, you're smarter than me. I'm under a lot of stress, I'm not very wise or world-weary, and I'm generally too busy being an intolerable, sarcastic asshole to be likeable to anyone.
But all I wanted to do was share this picture of the Pope hugging a man. Okay? Nothing else. I did not want this, and yet you brought it on anyway. So thanks for that.
I never said that I wanted this fucking argument, and you started it anyway.
You may be smarter than me. Good for you. I couldn't give a shit regardless. My point is that this is just a nice post to break the monotony of shitty news, especially in wake of that skyscraper fire in London. I guess one could make the argument that I posted this more for me than anything or anyone else.
Regardless of that, I do morning understand why you have to consistently begin arguments where they don't deserve to be. You may say that you're simply pointing out fallacies and errors; to that, I say, tone it down a little. You're doing too much. [cont.]

Do you get off on others' stress? Because the only reason why I kept dodging the questions was because I didn't want this. All I wanted was to make one nice post, and you tainted it. I hope you're happy.

No. I hate flawed reasoning and will call it out whenever I see it.

Even when it's not necessary and where no one asked for it, you're still going to be a bitch anyway?

So I'm the bitch for asking people to be intelligent? The problem with our civilization, ladies and gentleman.

You're a bitch because you're making a mountain out of a molehill. Repeatedly I said that I never wanted this and I explained why I responded the way that I did, and yet you still think you're the better person. I don't fucking give a shit about whether you're "intelligent", my point is that this is a FUN site and I don't want your bullshit clogging up my post.
You literally took a picture of the Pope doing a good deed, and my title saying that I love him and that people can dislike him for their own reasons, and made me out to be the asshole by "calling me out" and saying that my logic is flawed. Where the fuck did you need to come in? You weren't asked to intervene and give your opinion on it, and frankly I don't want it here.

You're the one who made a mountain out of it. I just pointed out flawed reasoning, your the one who made a big deal out of that.

Does the fact that I was dodging the question not hint at the idea that I'm not interested in an argument?

No, it says that you don't have a response. If you're not interested in an argument, maybe stop replying instead of "arguing" with insults, whining, and question dodges.

Fine, then. I'll do that next time, assuming that you'll harass me again.

Can you fuck off now since this conversation isn't going anywhere?

Wow, downvoting without a response. Classic funsubstance.

Hey, that wasn't me. Though now I am too.

I'm not surprised.

Yeah. I hate having to say it, but I hope I don't have a kid with a disability.
I don't have ANYTHING against the mentally handicapped; it's just that I don't think I can handle parenting someone that is developmentally disabled.
Hopefully if I do have a kid like this, then love will overtake awkwardness and I'll just see them as my kid.

I 100% agree with you @rosebud. I'd not be able to handle it either. I don't think I'd be able to handle a fully developed child let alone one that is mentally deficient.

I want to have kids a lot, and obviously I'd have to do my best to be a sufficient parent if the kid comes out not quite right. But it would just be easier for everyone if my kid was normal. I feel like I'm walking on eggshells while saying this.