Circumcision has always felt like a violation of human rights to me. It's not required to keep the boy alive and healthy, yet parents commonly circumcise their newborn son when the kid can't even consent to it.
I heard an argument about that the other day. Then, I laughed, as someone stated that kids shouldn't even get names until they are old enough to choose their own name. I was like "Dafuq is wrong with people!"
Circumcision prevents some infections, lowers the risks of std's and makes pissing easier although this is by a minimal amount.
I don't have a dick so I can't say first hand that it's worth it
5
deleted
· 6 years ago
Whats the cons of a circumcision? Whyre you against it?
deleted
· 6 years ago
It is done against the child's consent, has little impact on the life of the child, has been done so much that mutilated genitals are someone's preference, if done in correctly can make the child lose the head of their penis, and finally leads to scarred skin which is unsightly.
▼
deleted
· 6 years ago
But isnt it best do to when they cant remember feeling it? Like piercings
1
deleted
· 6 years ago
It has little positive impact and is forever. You can take piercings out, but you can't regrow skin that was cut off.
The US is the only modern country that has high rates of circumsicion, and it was started in the 1910's by the creator of Kellogg to stop men from masturbating. Adam ruins everything did a video on this topic
That's really interesting. In my opinion it doesn't really matter if your circumcised or not as long as it doesn't cause long term pain or problems for the individual
I don't have a dick so I can't say first hand that it's worth it