Comments
Follow Comments Sorted by time
deleted
· 7 years ago
· FIRST
Cool
18
guest
· 7 years ago
The one of few acceptable uses of DLC
19
deleted
· 7 years ago
Except that they've done this campaign in one of the most scumbag moves ever. Only a percentage of the money is going towards family, and only if that purchase was made within the US. They've marketed it as a "Charity" DLC even outside of the US, but all of that money is going to the company. And even in the US it's only about 60% of the earnings. They're using this guys death as a marketing campaign and it's disgusting
27
rosemagwin
· 7 years ago
That's capitalism for ya
3
tarotnathers13th
· 7 years ago
Or just disgusting business practices. Warner Brothers is notoriously shit at endearing goodwill with their business decisions.
10
Show All
grim
· 7 years ago
yeah, capitalism
1
rachee
· 7 years ago
Depends on the situation if they were making a dlc and this guy died and they were like lest add him and make some money for the family that's OK if they are keeping a lot of it but if they saw this guy die and were like hay lets make a dlc and exploit his death then ya they suck. If its Warner Brothers then ya they probably making to exploit every thing they touch turns to shit.
2
deleted
· 7 years ago
I mean I'm getting the game regardles, shitty devs or not I've waited years for this thing.
1
deleted
· 7 years ago
Hey should I get this or XCOM 2?
famousone
· 7 years ago
XCOM all the way
