Comments
Follow Comments Sorted by time
sm19
· 6 years ago
· FIRST
What really grinds my gears is that in Wakefields redacted paper, the sample size was only 12 kids. How did that get past the peer review process - that number is not enough for a proper study!! At least give a bigger sample size to fake your data to make it look more statistically significant!
19
diyrogue
· 6 years ago
Weren't the 12 kids also attendees at a kids party and he took samples without parents permission ?
20
smitty
· 6 years ago
And paid them, in addition to falsifying data.
8
diyrogue
· 6 years ago
Which he admitted to falsifying and got his licence revoked
5
matthewg
· 6 years ago
And as we all know, that's all it takes to unring that bell. ;)
1
poisin_kat
· 6 years ago
Let's get a vaccine for that
4
matthewg
· 6 years ago
If only we could vaccinate against gullibility and corruption.
6
smitty
· 6 years ago
That's called education, scientific literacy and Skepticisim.
8
matthewg
· 6 years ago
;)
guest
· 6 years ago
Gulf war syndrome
