Not necessarily.
For one, they didn't have all the their usual resources, so they were working at a disadvantage.
Secondly, sometimes there's nothing anyone can do to save the patient. Even in the middle of state-of-the-art hospitals in optimal conditions perfectly competent doctors still can't save everyone.
As a first aider, I know this. There is no reason to fire someone for many circumstances which may contribute to someone's ill health and inability to live regardless of the care received. I was trying to make a joke, but it seems to have been taken more seriously than anticipated. Thanks for your explanation though.
For one, they didn't have all the their usual resources, so they were working at a disadvantage.
Secondly, sometimes there's nothing anyone can do to save the patient. Even in the middle of state-of-the-art hospitals in optimal conditions perfectly competent doctors still can't save everyone.