it does have the benefit of not having to worry about the wire coming loose. Wireless accessories are most likely always going to be 1. more expensive than wired stuff and 2. less reliable than wired stuff. there will be exceptions here or there, there are with everything, (see: that new wireless VR gear set) but as a whole they are going to be more expensive for less reliability in exchange for not having a wire.
but there's still the question raised about the effects of the frequencies exposure over long term use, i'm pretty sure there will a study to find out any correlation between wireless headphones and possible (brain) cancer in the future
its highly unlikely. Thats the same thought line that caused people to be afraid of radio waves and TV signals. Most wireless headphones and such use bluetooth which is in itself in the radio range. There's never been any reliable study that shows that such things can cause cancer simply because they dont have the energy required to damage you. You can do the math on the energy yourself (E = hc/λ h being planks constant, c being the speed of light and λ being the wavelength of the light you are doing) and compare the amount of energy that it has to real world examples of other types of "light" that do cause cancer ( your chance of getting cancer from sun exposure is extremely different during certain times of day because what kind of light you are exposed to)
the difference in energy between the two ends of the viable light spectrum is extreme with red light having a length of up to 740 nanometers (the smaller the length the more energy the wave as the constant hc is divided by it)
radio waves are at the smallest 1 millimeter all the way up to 100 kilometers which is exponentially larger than red light, the largest variety of viable light and total safe to humans, meaning its exponentially weaker than red light making it exponentially safer to humans.
big difference, radio and television, you can listen to at a distance, wireless in ear earbugs? say the danger zone is 5cm from the source, watching tv, you're fine. No study yet, as i said, most likely there will be one in the future.
did you not read anything that i wrote? the wavelength is far too large to be able to do damage at all. Red light is perfectly save for humans as its too weak because as wavelength goes up the energy goes down. bluetooth (the example i used before) is around 100,000 times larger wavelength than that of red light (which as i said before is perfectly safe for humans) so your average wireless device hits you 100,000 times weaker than the safe light.
also there isnt any difference in tv and radio, they are both light and all light moves at the same speed, wave length is the only difference between the two and as i said before the wavelength of radio light is 100,000 times weaker than the weakest visable light
yes, and at one point lead pipes was ok for water, smoking was considered fine, I'm just saying long term, like 20-30 years of exposure, can you honestly say for that duration of continual repetitive exposure that nothing will happen?
with mathematical certainty. I know the math, i understand the science, i can say for damn sure that wireless doesnt have the strength to do damage to anything. as i said above, its the exact same thing as people being afraid of TV signals and radio stations. Anyone that tells you there is a difference between those and wireless is either lying to you or ignorant of how light works.
as i said above, do the math yourself and compare the amount of energy that a wireless device's EM wave has and compare it to the thing that actually gives people cancer, ultraviolet light, and then compare them both to the strength of red light, safe light and look at the extreme difference energy between just red and ultra violet and look at the far more extreme difference in energy in wireless and red light.
the difference in energy between the two ends of the viable light spectrum is extreme with red light having a length of up to 740 nanometers (the smaller the length the more energy the wave as the constant hc is divided by it)
also there isnt any difference in tv and radio, they are both light and all light moves at the same speed, wave length is the only difference between the two and as i said before the wavelength of radio light is 100,000 times weaker than the weakest visable light
as i said above, do the math yourself and compare the amount of energy that a wireless device's EM wave has and compare it to the thing that actually gives people cancer, ultraviolet light, and then compare them both to the strength of red light, safe light and look at the extreme difference energy between just red and ultra violet and look at the far more extreme difference in energy in wireless and red light.