He registered the domain and "claims" to have filed for a trademark, but he's not going to get it. You can't trademark a common phrase because it would be impossible to enforce, let alone verify the validity of their rights to that trademark, especially if she can prove she was using it as branding prior to his application, which he's now publicly admitted to.
Well... let me put it this way- I’m a loan shark and you’re an office worker. You owe me money. If I break your hands- how can you pay me if you can’t type and do your job? If it was about money- I’d do what was smart or get my money. When you break the hands that could get the money, that isn’t smart business. It’s either sending a message or being sadistic. Either way you are now further from getting your money than before. Unless you are less about the money and more the principal. In which case, the fact I prevented you from earning and caused you grief makes us “even” and now you don’t owe me anymore because I basically burned the money you would have paid me. Otherwise- it’s just causing a person trouble while hurting yourself too. Like a bully.
While I don't know all the circumstances with this case, you dont borrow money from your loan shark and then take that money to make a sign saying I'm not paying you back. That's just asking for it.
1. Just so you know I didn’t DV you.
2. Reply: so, for context- she sued 50 as a plaintiff in a suit for the unauthorized release of a sexual rape of her. She lost and as part of his counter was ordered to pay him $30,000. She has not paid him as of this date. She released her “diss track” “I ain’t got it.” Asides the chorus of “I ain’t got it (the $30,000,) most of the lyrics are about how she struggled and is struggling, her strength, and then part references that she thinks it is petty that 50 etc. are harassing her for $30,000- under the implication that to a “baller” and entrepreneur that is a small amount, thus implying that 50 isn’t as big as he likes to present himself....
However- no where in the song that I am aware of does she say she isn’t ever going to pay- she says she cannot pay as she is not financially able to. I am not aware of how much of her personal money she spent on the track etc, however it’s common for producers to front most of the expenses for recording and make deals on distribution for higher profit share and or ownership rights of the IP. It’s also common practice to place investment before obligation- as if one has say- $40k cash and pays $30- they are left $10 which won’t do much to live on or invest- whereas if one invests $30k on a higher return- they can pay off the debt and live off the rest...
If one had say, $10k, and invested all 10- the 10 wouldn’t be able to pay off the 30, and they’d need a way to get 20k and survive- without resources to fund any venture to make the remaining sum. Therefore it’s financially intelligent to try and earn the money to facilitate payment and living than to short pay with your entire net. Additionally- as it is a court ordered payment, if the amount isn’t repayed or a payment agreement any be reached and followed- 50 has legal recourse to get the money and even possibly compel the court to seize assets from the defendant to pay the amount owed, such as garnishing wages or forfeiture of real or intellectual property rights.
However, it is possible that if it were shown that 50 were actively preventing her from paying back the money, and a reasonably minded observer would say the action serves no legitimate business purpose but is inherently punitive or harassing- he might just lose that and or open himself up to counter suit again. So while I’m sure he is upset at being wrongfully accused in his and the laws eyes- and I can’t say wether he really cares about the money or not- it’s undeniable he wouldn’t have engaged in this behavior with someone he didn’t have a “grudge” with and it is counter productive to the interest of getting paid back.
Well like I said I didn't know the circumstances. Don't worry about DV on this website. People will DV just for the fuck of it, especially guests. My initial comment was an honest question which apparently someone didn't like me asking. I don't care enough about this topic nor the people involved to actually research into it like that anyway so thank you for the information.
2. Reply: so, for context- she sued 50 as a plaintiff in a suit for the unauthorized release of a sexual rape of her. She lost and as part of his counter was ordered to pay him $30,000. She has not paid him as of this date. She released her “diss track” “I ain’t got it.” Asides the chorus of “I ain’t got it (the $30,000,) most of the lyrics are about how she struggled and is struggling, her strength, and then part references that she thinks it is petty that 50 etc. are harassing her for $30,000- under the implication that to a “baller” and entrepreneur that is a small amount, thus implying that 50 isn’t as big as he likes to present himself....