So thankful

As a matter of fact- classically height has been something men care about. Pageants specifically judged on a male dominated standard of beauty tend to include height- you don’t see a lot of models and beauty queens who are super short do you? “Long legs..” “long elegant neck...” so on and on- classic standards of female beauty. Wide shoulders? Usually not considered classically beautiful- with a certain body ratio and the “hour glass” shape being the de facto pedigree on the subject- a shape not just influenced by ones fitness or weight but by genetics and bone structure.

So I do have to reject the basic premise and execution- even if I at least applaud the idea that short guys and broke guys shouldn’t be automatically counted out as being good people and or potential dates on their own merits. But there very much are standards that each gender applies towards the gender(s) they are attracted to- and those often differ gender to gender, so the fact men don’t hold women to the same standard of attractiveness as women look for in men kind of makes sense- considering few men looking for women are hoping she has the “good dick” are they? Dating might be far harder yet still for women if men required their female dates to have a big penis and know how to use it no? So derp. You can’t really assign heterosexual gender preferences in mates uniformly in all cases can you? Men and women will tend to look for different things or else we’d all be trying to date the same people no?