If you had to defend your stance with a fight to the death at dawn there would be alot

If you had to defend your stance with a fight to the death at dawn there would be alot less offended people today.
(TITLE FROM REDDIT r/FunGags)

There would be a lot less talking if you had to risk your life to prove your convictions about something. But... a few problems with that. Firstly- as annoying and confusing as it can be having so many voices- isn’t that the purpose of western style democracy? Of the freedom of speech? To give everyone a voice, even those we think are idiots or those who we disagree with? People say “offended” a lot. It’s not wrong to be offended or offend someone. Art is often offensive. It offends me to think of Slavery, Ellis Island. That which offends our humanity can Spur us to act, to think, to see things we wouldn’t choose to see otherwise. We don’t have to agree. But being offensive for just to offend or out of ignorance or carelessness isn’t constructive.

You should be glad that nowadays we can voice our concerns more easily. In the past, we wouldn't be allowed to be offended that someone said we should die, should not be near kids, should not marry, because we'd be killed or jailed. People aren't more sensitive now, we're just allowed to speak now.