Comments
Follow Comments Sorted by time
guest_
· 4 years ago
· FIRST
So much wrong here. Firstly- by definition of “alien” any being that pre dates earth cannot be from earth and is therefore an alien. “God” would be an alien, Zeus MIGHT be as the mythology sometimes holds the “Olympus” of the Gods separate from earth. Secondly- the Big Bang DID NOT create earth. Earth formed in the conditions AFTER the Big Bang and can be said to be a consequence of the Big Bang but not a direct effect. If you built the first computer you did not create the iPhone- the iPhone was a development upon the creation of the computer. Dependent but not the same instance.
2
guest_
· 4 years ago
Now- we can go further and say that “the Big Bang” is not an acceptable answer anymore than “gravity” or “heat” would be. Part of the puzzle but not the whole. More over- the Big Bang is an event- so if we want to say the Big Bang created earth by proxy- we’d have to say what created the Big Bang. So science can’t answer the question of who or what “created” earth but can only list circumstances and mechanisms of its creation at this point.
2
guest_
· 4 years ago
From the listed answers- even though god as an entity and “alien” would be interchangeable- god as a concept would not be. Meaning alien or god could both be acceptable answers- but “god” would be most acceptable even if a person doesn’t believe in god because “god did it” is an explanation meaning- “unknown mechanism” the same as “Big Bang” is- but is actually listed. Much the same as a non believer might say “gawd damnit” or “gawd, what is wrong with you?” These are examples of the term “god” outside religious context.
1
