To be fair it's entirely possible the judge sided with her because his wife is a supporter of Heard.
.
She was blindly listened to, made the face of domestic violence and sexual assault, and allowed to get away with it for YEARS because she's a famous woman in the MeToo era.
.
You gotta give proper credit where it's due
Xvarnah makes some good points. The judge in the UK case does have ties that could imply sympathy to Heard. Heard has also been in the media and telling her side of the story, which could influence the verdict. It’s also important to note that the judge didn’t necessarily “side with heard because she’s a woman...” I will say this for the 400th for people who don’t understand basics of law. THE SUIT WASNT TO DETERMINE IF HEARD BEAT DEPP. THE CASE WAS TO DETERMINE WETHEF DEPP COULD BE SAID TO BEAT HEARD. A judge didn’t rule that Heard never beat Depp. That wasn’t what the suit was about. It was about wether the paper knowingly lied by accusing Depp of beating his wife. It wasn’t a case of “her against him” or was a case of wether it was reasonable for a paper to call him a wife beater.
Also the case was not whether or not Amber heard was abusive as well but was a libel case against a newspaper so doesn't have an effect on deciding who was the worse abuser
.
She was blindly listened to, made the face of domestic violence and sexual assault, and allowed to get away with it for YEARS because she's a famous woman in the MeToo era.
.
You gotta give proper credit where it's due