Of course. Personally I'm comfortable at 71 F (21.66667 C) but hot at 72 F (22.222222C). This type of sensitivity is one of the reasons people who use Fahrenheit like to give as another reason it's not a bad system.
there are multiple reasons why F is basically the only measurement system from imperial that's better than its metric equivalent
F is more precise, in general you'll have many spots of "equivalency" where, when using whole numbers like most people do, a change in F wont be shown as a change in C, C's gaps between whole numbers is larger and therefor less precise.
Another big point in favor of F is as follows
generally people herald C as being super amazing because it makes a nice easy 0-100 scale that humans can easily deal with for water temperature with 0 being freezing for water and 100 being boiling for water. This is never used by another outside of a children's science class. When freezing water people throw it in the freezer and wait and then later see if it froze, no measuring. To boil water people do the same with the stove, the nice clean easy for the human brain to deal with 0-100 has no purpose for 99% of the population in C.
-
-
this is not true for F, F has a similar 0-100 but one that aligns nicely to human dealings with air temperature
which equates out to weather, which a very large amount of people actively check daily.
it makes a very nice easy to deal with set up where, going from 100 down, you hit the point "comfortable for most people at about 30 away from the top of the 0-100 and then get less and less "widely comfortable" until you hit the same distance from the top of the scale that comfortable is, but from the bottom of the scale with freezing weather outside being situated at about 30 degrees away from the low end of the scale making the whole thing a nice clean 0-100 sliding scale for weather with very easy to remember points that easily represent something that people actually will have some USE for.
F is more precise, in general you'll have many spots of "equivalency" where, when using whole numbers like most people do, a change in F wont be shown as a change in C, C's gaps between whole numbers is larger and therefor less precise.
Another big point in favor of F is as follows
generally people herald C as being super amazing because it makes a nice easy 0-100 scale that humans can easily deal with for water temperature with 0 being freezing for water and 100 being boiling for water. This is never used by another outside of a children's science class. When freezing water people throw it in the freezer and wait and then later see if it froze, no measuring. To boil water people do the same with the stove, the nice clean easy for the human brain to deal with 0-100 has no purpose for 99% of the population in C.
-
this is not true for F, F has a similar 0-100 but one that aligns nicely to human dealings with air temperature
which equates out to weather, which a very large amount of people actively check daily.
it makes a very nice easy to deal with set up where, going from 100 down, you hit the point "comfortable for most people at about 30 away from the top of the 0-100 and then get less and less "widely comfortable" until you hit the same distance from the top of the scale that comfortable is, but from the bottom of the scale with freezing weather outside being situated at about 30 degrees away from the low end of the scale making the whole thing a nice clean 0-100 sliding scale for weather with very easy to remember points that easily represent something that people actually will have some USE for.