True. No one is asking (yet) for the lay person to capture women, you might say they are encouraging people to assist the state in the detainment for trial, or if necessary capture by the state for trial and sentencing of fellow citizens; by informing on your fellow citizens to the state for violations of moral majority in gerrymandered districts.
And really- it’s not even that since they specifically removed the state as a plaintiff and created a civil law where the state is just the enforcer- so it’s actually more that the party members behind the act subverted the constitution and side stepped the system of checks and balances in order to create create a method where they could allow citizens to sue each other over perceived breaches of morality as a personal vendetta where the plaintiff brining suit had no grounds to claim personal or property damage or even any legal stake such as guardianship or conservatorship- stake asides moral indignation anyway.
And really- it’s not even that since they specifically removed the state as a plaintiff and created a civil law where the state is just the enforcer- so it’s actually more that the party members behind the act subverted the constitution and side stepped the system of checks and balances in order to create create a method where they could allow citizens to sue each other over perceived breaches of morality as a personal vendetta where the plaintiff brining suit had no grounds to claim personal or property damage or even any legal stake such as guardianship or conservatorship- stake asides moral indignation anyway.