They can come up here if they want. Churchill would be lot bigger if people actually wanted to live on a tundra.

Its not like Canada has any particular desire not to build up there, its just too desolate to bother. We also have our share of climate skeptics, we're really not all that different from the States in that regard.

No, you are being disingenuous. I refuse to believe you have this flawed of an understanding of how language works.

It getting hard to assume you aren't being disingenuous. Are you actually trying to invalidate the idea of a connotation?
I don't "have a feeling", I'm aware that the word "pronoun" has an LGBT connotation, and I'm pretty sure you're aware of it too.
Just because its not in the dictionary definition doesn't mean it somehow an invalid observation. That's the entire reason to call something a connotation.

You may not understand what a connotation is.

The existence of happy poor people suggests that money is not necessary to obtain happiness.
The existence of miserable poor people doesn't weaken this suggestion.

Hunk is correct.

Not relevant.

Well enough in and of itself. A shame the Conservatives refuse to actually use the opportunity for the reasons people voted for it.

Being forced to "join in" to things that suck is probably a decent reason to be angry about something.
Also "join in" itself is still braindead, but actually expanding on the idea like you did is not, just to clear. I still don't agree, though.

Recent phones tend not to have a headphone jack, and having to charge batteries and deal with potential connection issues easily makes any argument against bluetooth headphones/earbuds compelling.
Also "you should just join in" is a brain-dead argument.