I just play the over under game. I look at what little is in my cart and guess if it's going to be over or under $100. Used to be I could really take up some space in the cart and still be under but today? Let's just say I'm carrying a whole lot less bags than before.

Lol. As I get older I can totally relate to the what my parents meant when they said I was a still a kid. Now that it's been 20 years on, teens really are just kids. Somewhat reliable, okay conversationalist (sometimes), and totally not mature enough to be in a relationship with. And I swear I was never that dumb, though I probably was. I imagine after a 100+ years they'd feel like they were robbing the cradle with 20-30 yr olds.

Now is there a response where someone takes this seriously and has to have it explained that pop is used because they pop out of the toaster? That's the one I want to see.

Oh, you mean a for profit business is catering to their market base. Shocking. It's almost like they like making money over doing what should be each individuals job in their society.

I can confirm that there are in fact colors on this map.

An open mind only means you're willing to listen to what someone says not that you have to except what they're speaking as anything more than trash. So let's break this down.
1. Okay, you put this out there.
2. Doesn't make it true, also doesn't make it false.
3. You're a scumbag if you're actually "pretending" and not a real one.
4. May be entirely true, you might not hear it on mainstream media. They may in fact be ranting. Lots of people rant doesn't mean anything. Doesn't make the thing true or false.
5. Yep, lots of people do this. Lot's a people put stuff on the internet and make money from the content. No difference between them and main stream media who make money on the same thing as these guys.
Now lets add some.
6. Thinking something has to be false because some nut says it's true on youtube means you're close minded.
7. Thinking that unless mainstream media takes it up it's probably not true or researched correctly makes you close minded.

The best part is if you swap Woman and Man the conversation is still true.

Granted this only works on certain churches. If it's a regular church it'll do nothing since they're following the rules. Just so everyone is aware churches, all tax exempt organizations, do still have to pay some taxes called Non Ad Valorem tax. This covers things like emergency services, utilities(local infrastructure), lighting....etc. That's not to say some aren't abusing the exemptions but it runs similar in frequency to normal businesses that commit tax fraud.

Teacher: All right pop quiz time. This is worth %30 of your grade. Don't worry this is completely based off the homework so if you did it you'll have the answers. You have 5 minutes.

Umm, no. Instead I think we should treat it like you do any dangerous hornet hive and light it on fire.

Well that's easy. All you have to do is just look at it for a few moments and you'd see it too. Obviously there are only two that could really use the decrescendo but only the one without moving into the overly dramatic. It's not hard. Just look at the argument, counter argument of them while not ignoring the supporting elements of the other parts. Is it building tension or resolving? Of course you don't decrescendo the resolving that's just silly. Unless, of course it's needed for effect. At least half of these are in the building phase and you certainly aren't going to be putting a decrescendo there, well unless the counter part is needed to build the tension to offset the main line, but that not pointedly not the case in these selections.

Person 1: You're gender fluid?
Person 2: Yes, sometimes I'm a man and sometimes I'm woman.
Person 1: Okay, and it says here you think all men are pigs?
Person 2: Lol, yes men are just pigs, they never treat you with the respect you deserve.
Person 1: But sometimes you're a man. Does that make you a pig?
Person 2: Well no because I'm a woman.
Person 1: ?? But you said sometimes you're a woman and sometimes you're a man.
Person 2: Yes, I'm genderfluid.
Person 1: So when you're a man you're a pig.
Person 2: Well men are pigs but I'm not a pig when I'm a man.
Person 1: But all men are pigs?
Person 2: Yes, just not with me. I'm not a pig.
Person 1: Then not all men are pigs.
Person 2 : No, all men are pigs.
Person 1: Then you're not a man.
Person 2: How dare you!! Who are you to .....

Yeah no, there have been several that have written more than nine and likely the most prodigious with 342 is still alive. But it is interesting how many only got to 8-10 before they died.
https://www.cmuse.org/who-wrote-the-most-symphonies/

Tsutomu Yamaguchi
https://www.history.com/news/the-man-who-survived-two-atomic-bombs
One of maybe 175 that survived both bombings.

You do still need to properly conjugate it though.

Unless your in a state that doesn't require a reason to terminate. In those states as long as the "reported" reason is not one of the very few illegal ones they can certainly get rid of you. It then puts the entire onus on you to prove they fired you illegally. And just so you know the reason can be as simple as "failure to conform to company environment". That's a great generic reason and there's almost nothing you can say or do to prove that that's not the reason.

This is the way.

That's a thing? I mean news with the Kardashians in it. I went years where I had no clue who they were and this was when they were in their rising fame state. Even today, unless it's lambasted everywhere, I doubt I'd see something about them.

I like how some of them look genuinely puzzled about whats happening.