That's it. Comment of the year, everyone else can go home.

Some guys are into that though

Thanks, you as well

You've got a solid argument, I have to admit, but there is one big point I want to stress. Very few actual "assault weapons" exist in the civilian market, and the few that do cost tens of thousands of dollars and are already heavily regulated. A lot of the modern firearms dubbed "assault weapons", while cosmetically similar to their mil-spec siblings, are heavily de militarized in terms of the internal mechanisms in order to meet the existing laws. And the firearms designed exclusively for hunting aren't any less lethal in terms of efficiency (army snipers still use bolt action rifles which are almost identical to civilian hunting rifles). But, in the end, there's no easy solution, and I'm done arguing. We're all here for fun, not politics, anyways aren't we? *extends hand* truce?

The firearms-homicide link is a debate for another day( I personally think it goes deeper than that), but I will say that banning certain classes of firearms such as MSRs will do absolutely no good in the same way that banning drugs does no good. They'll be harder to find, yes, but it will also ensure that criminals are the ONLY people that have them.

While not a literal quote, I would be genuinely surprised if it isn't in her agenda. She's made it perfectly clear that she is against anything more than the most limited civilian firearms ownership.

They're a blessing from the omnipresent mods