Plot-twist: The corgi's legs work at 200% efficiency. It is not the corgi flipping, but the earth flipping around the dog.

If any, 'cause she's plastic.

Mexico is actually the most obese nation in the world. Guess you could say that they get the run-offs of the U.S.

I always wanted to be a dinosaur because I had dinosaur dolls.

Or Sedentary Man.

Barbie's advice: http://nowiknow.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Weight-Loss-Barbie.jpg

http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/imagebuzz/web04/2011/8/11/12/honk-honk-10343-1313079985-59.jpg

It's all water weight. Some of them are very sensitive about it, as shown above.

Relevant username.

Welcome to society.

Maybe they were hopped up on epidurals? Or maybe they just want to watch the world burn...

Probably thought they could use another name. Daisy or something.

'Traitors!'

Oh, and NSFW.

//C hello world example
#include <stdio.h>

int main()
{
printf("Hello world\n");
return 0;
}

No, I am -stating- that breasts are sexual parts of the body used in the cycle of reproduction. Society is the one implying that breasts should stay covered, at no point have I addressed the covered vs. uncovered argument. My first post was correcting a fallacy of erogenous zones being purely that. My second post was an attempt to make you and the others more knowledgeable on the reproductive cycle as a whole; furthermore, the third post was correcting some confusion you seem to have found in what I put down. Also, if you read the third post over again, I state that you can do what pleases you, be it cutting both your tits off, using formula... can you draw any further conclusions from the character I have hinted at there? Hm? You seem to be good at drawing conclusions... even if they are the wrong ones. Ah, found it. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jbq_1Wy70rE Was that one still too veiled for you?

It's almost Disney evil!

I'm not denying any of that, just taking a mildly informative stand. You want to have a double mastectomy, you do that. You want to feed your baby with formula, you do that. I'm not talking about breasts being used to make a baby, I'm talking about the utility of the breast. Which seems to be the tangent this discussion has begun to address, amirite?
Ah, upon reflection I see where you could draw the conclusion you did. There is no, 'feeding process' after reproduction. The two processes seem to be lumped -- see what I did there? -- together. Reproduction, for humans is sex until the child is independent enough to fend for themselves. So, you may not need a breast to -make- a baby, but the use of them is part of the reproduction cycle.

http://ufodigest.com/news/0909/images/sloth.jpg
I'll just leave this here.

If you give a pug a cookie, he's going to want a glass of milk.

This is not the end of society. People simply feel the need to label their children with things that have changed their lives. There was a family in Egypt during the revolution recently that named their child 'Facebook.' Because Facebook was the facilitator of the revolution and they wanted their child to be relevant in the times to come. Don't get me wrong, I do not condone this action... at all.

@Nerdarecool1212. Male breasts can still produce milk if absolutely necessary. They may be vestigial for most intents and purposes, but they are still partly necessary for the reproduction process. Also, this: http://funsubstance.com/fun/92322/afro-h-my-god/