I mean, it IS informative, but I'm not sure it's actually HELPFUL

(barring extenuating circumstances and assuming the man in question is being cooperative) Those places are what I like to call wrong

Apparently unripe papaya is also used by women...
.
In other news, Alabama would like to know your location

Arguing that she was using it for a class project (that it's unclear if she even made the people she received the content from aware of) is sure to go over really well. As is arguing that it's difficult to recognize who it came from. The police have been known to be very understanding when someone posts a 14 year olds genitals in a place they are likely to be seen by at least a few dozen people. They especially love it when you try and tell them "well it's not like their name is on it or anything."
.
Most likely no one will ever actually look into it. But considering the actual risks involved, and the fact that she should be actively doing her damndest to make sure she's NOT exploiting children with her carelessness, it hardly seems worthwhile.

It doesn't actually matter if the person sharing the content is supposed to be over the age of consent. It doesn't even matter if the person in the picture is NOW over the age of consent. If the person depicted in the content is under the age of consent in the picture in all likelihood falls under the child pornography laws. Receiving it may be forgivable if she has a lawyer, but by posting it in her project she is now actively redistributing content that is considered an active crime scene.

I definitely missed something so that broke my brain a small bit

You are literally the one that brought gender into it and asked if it would be more acceptable if the behavior had been exhibited by a man. Which, regardless of your motives for doing so, implies the problem stems from it being women behaving in this manner. So yeah, I guess when people suggest something might be a gender issue I do have a weird habit of speaking on it's context as a gender issue.
.
Also, these women literally have their shorts yanked up their asses, straddling rocks in their bras, and you think the woman in the background is "closer to being naked" because her clothing might be workout gear?
Assuming we're talking about the woman in blue, her top is no tighter than the girls on the rocks. And it's not even form fitting - her pants/skirt are baggy, her midriff is covered. She is nowhere near as close to naked as the women literally wedgying themselves (and each other) for sexual attention

I'm keeping this reply as short as possible because this thread has left me unreasonably irritated.
.
It's not a gender issue or a clothing issue it's a behavior issue. And if someone can't articulate why a behavior that is clearly sexually driven in nature is inappropriate in public that doesn't mean it should be allowed.

Never heard of a place having a male, female, and gender neutral changing room. Sounds like a better solution than forcing women and men to share them.

Final note:
-anybody taking up the space of three people because their legs are open wider than a woman's when she's giving birth is an asshole. Don't do that.
.
-The chairs are stupid. Don't do them either

Tbh I think it's interesting to see what's out there. Hopefully someone will read this thread at some point and learn something new (I certainly did).
.
As an aside directed at no one in particular I also think it's important to remember that throughout history women were very specifically forbidden from being allowed to contribute to society in almost any way that existed outside of homemaking. They weren't allowed to vote, they weren't allowed to speak, they were denied education and jobs, and works they did attempt to contribute were often dismissed the moment people realized a woman was behind it. They were largely treated as ornamental. Why that's been the case throughout so many cultures I've always found a bit bizarre, but it's still a part of mankind's many faceted history. Still, many of them found ways to contribute outside of the spotlight.

I probably could keep going but it's 2:30 in the morning, and while I haven't quite rambled on for 18 pages I feel more is unnecessary at this point in time

Flossie Wong - the first person to clone HIV, leading to huge advancements including the connection between it and AIDs, as well as the ability to diagnose it via bloodwork.
.
Tu Youyou who contributed largely to the treatmeent for malaria
.
Amy Hennig - head director as well as a script writer and (iirc) producer for the "Uncharted" series
.
Queen Ana Nzinga, who managed to keep the Portuguese slave trade out of Angola for 30 years
.
Temple Grandin - an animal rights advocate who helped invent/improve ways of keeping and restraining animals to cause less stress or cruelty. Also advocated and helped encourage better conditions for animals at slaughter houses. Also a public speaker, with autism, who invented the actual "hug-box."
.
Margaret Atwood, author of many influential books and occasional producer of their TV adaptations, including "the Handmaid's Tale." Also invented the LongPen, which allows a person to use a tablet to control and write with a pen from a remote location.