Yeah exactly, either share the housework or establish some roles with which both parties will be happy. But it's unacceptable to expect one partner to work as much as the other AND do housework. Just equality, man.

My family is a bit traditional so it usually falls on my mom to do the cleaning and cooking while my dad does the maintenance and also has a more stressful job so he earns more. But if both partners have careers on the same level, both should share cleaning and maintenance. And stuff like oiling the doorframe or tightening some screws is really not that hard.

@songdae yeah I just wanted to point that out as well. I always thought women have a higher pain tolerance than men because they'd otherwise faint or die from pain during childbirth.

Nobody does their car or home maintenance anymore, they just call a mechanic/technician/plumber/whatever. And basic maintenance (meaning stuff that is simple enough that you don't need a specialist) is done once or twice a year, cleaning is an everyday thing.

Men who do housework*

Same.

@regretfulforeigner Agreed. The royal family has massive wealth and fame just for being born, and apparently the Brits fucking love them. Why? What did they do?
The British government could easily function without them. They should let Queen Elizabeth II. live the rest of her life like this just out of respect for the old lady, but then make the UK a republic. Why waste a portion of the national GDP on some glorified celebrities' luxury?

I read somewhere that she'll appoint a centrist justice so I don't know about that. Yeah, if we went pure policy wise, she'd be better, but both the republican and the democratic party have become a joke. Neither of them are interested in freedom, they just wanna win. Still, Clinton is a bit less crazy than Trump in my opinion, but your point about neither parties liking him and therefore not allowing him to do anything is really good, I haven't thought of it that way before.

I know, it was a The Last of Us reference.

Buttscarleton must've been trying to catch the fog. But he mist.

And no in Czech.

Yeah, she is way too hawkish and too right wing for a democrat, and very corrupt. But I don't believe she would actually start a war with Russia. She called Putin a warmonger and a bully, to which Putin responded "if she wins the election, it's war!" which is a total emotional overreaction. Putin would be the one starting conflict here, not her (if either of them were actually hotheaded enough to do so, which again would probably come from Putin's side because Hillary is cold and calculating but in any case I don't believe they would actually start a war). But she is way too hooked on Wall Street to dare do something as big as an actual war. I think the most likely scenario here is that she'll be just a bit worse than Obama. But Trump is a wild card so there's a 50% chance he will get just as corrupt and bought by Wall Street (and evidence about his actual wealth implies that it might be so) and a 50% chance he will just go totally crazy and try to deport all Mexicans and Muslims etc.

The problem is that you get extreme human interaction and then extreme solitude. Being in that crazy cycle for a long time might fuck you up pretty badly.

I've never been in prison and I'm guessing that neither were you so I think we shouldn't underestimate it.

I agree with Barney here. Trump is trying to become besties with Putin, and also talks about getting rid of the Geneva conventions and NATO. If Russia and the US put their forces together, I'm afraid they would at least limit NATO's power which is obviously what Putin wants because then he can threaten the rest of Europe. As a Central European, I'm quite afraid of that and would take Clinton over Trump because of her foreign policy. Trump says he wants to "make America great again" but I'm afraid that he'd compromise international relations with the rest of the world (except Russia) while trying to do so. This is not just about the US, this is about the world.
I think Hillary's extremely corrupt and bought by Wall Street, however the email scandal which is her biggest problem right now was more of an oversight/negligence thing than malicious intent. Policy wise, she's better than Trump. His biggest problem is not understanding politics and doing crazy dangerous stuff.

But solitary confinement is kinda mild torture, isn't it? And this is solitary confinement x1000.

I thought the same. Maybe bad lighting of the photo?