That makes a lot more sense than paying for the tickets.

He wasn't flamboyant anymore when he realized he won't get what he wanted.
Which is why I concluded he's a fuckboi – pretends to be super nice at first but once he realizes he can't have the girl he wants, he shows his true colours which aren't very pretty.

Why is it common practice to automatically downvote guests here? I kinda agree with them. And they got downvoted for agreeing with someone who got upvoted, why?
Edit: maybe if you guys answered instead of downvoting like blind sheep, we all might come to an understanding. I'd really like that because if anything grinds my gears, it's people who downvote you without saying why they disagree. I sometimes feel like I'm trying to talk to a wall, seriously. Except a wall may have more interesting opinions than people who do the answerless downvoting.

Agreed 100% but judging by the obnoxiously desperate "hiiiii ;)" I can tell that Alex was obviously trying to get into the girl's pants. She saw through it and automatically went for the "I have a boyfriend" excuse.
Funny thing is that the same guys (I'm talking about fuckbois now) who will call you a bitch for saying you have a boyfriend will also call you a bitch or something for not saying it right away because you were "leading them on". But in my experience those fuckbois are rare and most guys are reasonable beings who will just back off when you tell them you're taken.

Sarcasm?

Hail Alfadir!

Oh ok so it's just triggered extremist conservatives again. Why am I not surprised?
Also clearing the pavement as well as the roads seems reasonable enough considering how much snow Scandinavian countries usually get, but if what has been said above is true and it made the snow clearers neglect the roads, then it's of course a baloney proposition by dumbass politicians.

^ikr, how can cleaning snow be sexist? I really don't get it.
Also, @isuck479, liberalism ≠ feminism. Politically I'm a liberal but I am also anti-feminist because 3rd wave feminism has become just a silly movement of silly people, to put it lightly. Why do people associate being left leaning with being an SJW and right leaning with being anti-SJW? I'm left leaning but hate safe spaces and trigger warnings and all this childish shit.
Just because a few children on twitter say they're liberal and SJW doesn't mean all liberals are. These children most likely have no idea about politics whatsoever and just say they're liberal cause it sounds cool or to rebel against their conservative parents.

Huh, I never thought of it that way. I guess you're right, also people would probably rather trust one omnipotent god over a bunch of gods who argue all the time and each of them influences only one aspect of life.
Still, disrespecting someone for preferring pagan gods or spirits or being an atheist is just wrong and you won't undo it by a few minutes of praying.

That's just tons of makeup fam

There are idiots on both sides definitely but it always boggles my mind when uninformed republicans say that all liberals (or "libtards" as they like to call anyone with a different opinion than them) are SJWs, offended pussies etc. and then scream like a baby who just shat its diaper when you say something that doesn't fit their mindset.
This may seem biased but I've more often encountered a republican who quickly resorted to ad hominem attacks than a liberal. But that is probably because I debate more republicans than liberals as there's no use debating someone you mostly agree with. But yeah there are some extremist SJWs on the left that I debated in the past that were equally bad.

Czech Republic, but you were close. Anyway, can anyone explain to me how are Christianity/Islam/Judaism different from mythologies? What makes them so special that my previous comments/criticisms don't apply to them? (I guess @isuck479 will reply sooner or later, cause I really don't understand the whole "they explain things which makes them different" argument)
I'm an atheist but I'm pretty tolerant when it comes to religion which is why it always boggles my mind when I get laughed at because I advocate religious equality for "pagan" gods.

That's horrible, but your personal experience doesn't account for the whole. People with different experiences exist. For example, there aren't many Muslims in my country (in fact the only Muslim I know is a girl I went to school with and she's super nice, doesn't even wear a hijab so I guess her family is very progressive), and even the migrant crisis has barely touched us but the media is totally overreacting which causes some people to overreact too. There are even some anti-Islam (and basically anti-brown people) groups who post shit on Facebook but also gather in front of mosques and shout crap at Muslims who just wanna pray there. They even staged a fake ISIS attack, which is totally unacceptable.
As far as I'm concerned Christianity also explains stuff. You know, like the creation of the world and everything in it. It just doesn't go into detail as much as the Greeks. But anyway, why does that matter? Is it special because it doesn't explain why it rains or why there's echo?

I'm upvoting ya because I dislike it when people just blindly downvote someone without justification :) we might disagree on stuff but I'm not gonna downvote you or ever tell you to stop using your free speech right

Thanks for the tag yo, I'll check it out but I left a comment for you in the other thread, please read it.

Oh and also yes, Sharia law is fucking stupid and goes against basic human rights, but I think that's more about the society than the religion. You got anti-gay verses in the Bible as well but as a society we've developed past that, they haven't.
I mean even Dubai's legal system is based off Sharia, if I remember correctly there was a case with a woman being prosecuted for "extra marital sex" because she was raped…
But I'd like to point out that it was the Christian West who started a crusade against the Middle East because their religion was different. It was the western folk who were backwards and fundamentalist back then, and by setting their cities on fire we've basically destroyed the eastern folk's knowledge and culture and made their societal progress stagnate. If you meet a Muslim in the West today they're normal people because they adapted to our society, but the Middle East is a different story.
Also look at Israel and Palestine.
It's not the religion, it's the society.

That's because Christianity is basically a fanfiction of Judaism (based on a line in the Old Testament that foretold the coming of a savior) and Islam is a fanfiction of Christianity (based on a rumor that Jesus wasn't the son of God, just a prophet like Muhammad). All three were born in the Middle East, which is why these stories got around so fast. Don't you think that if this God existed, a number of similar monotheistic religions would appear all around the world?
Now I don't want to sound mean but using the same argumentation as you just did, I could say that the same/similar pantheon of gods was worshipped by both the Ancient Greeks and the Romans, which proves they're real. But we all know that's not true because the Romans basically ripped off the greek gods and conveniently renamed them. I could present the same "proof" with Nordic and Icelandic gods, or Slavic paganism, but of course I'd be laughed at. Do you see where I'm coming from?

Also, "gender roles can be good"? Once again I must laugh. So good not to give people a choice in the matter and force them to do certain things because they were born with certain genitals.
I don't think you've grasped what gender roles mean. Woman provider and man caretaker goes against traditional gender roles. It's a good example of establishing roles within the household, but if we were living in a world with prevalent gender roles, it'd be unacceptable. Gender roles stem from gender stereotypes, and while it's not inherently bad for a woman to stay at home and let the man work, what matters is the choice and consenzus between the two. Want to earn money and want your partner to stay at home or vice versa? Ok. Want to share chores and both go to work? Ok. Many people get the notion that only the sharing chores option is the egalitarian one, but I disagree. Any of these are okay as long as both parties agree and neither is forced to give anything up to do what their partner wants.

@isuck479 I'm not. Downvoting the one I'm debating goes against my morals. Islam is "10 times worse" than Christianity? Hahaha. Also when exactly did I defend Islam? By saying that banning all Muslims is stupid? Yeah, fighting against religious discrimination makes me such a bad person.
Religion is just made up stories, no religion is better or worse than any other because it's fictional. Unless you want to compare religions like fiction books (which they stem from) in which case Christianity, Judaism and Islam are the worst because their god is a Mary Sue.
Stereotyping an entire group of people is discrimination, such as if I said that ALL Christians are dumb fundamentalists. But I used the example of a stereotypical fundamentalist's mindset to illustrate a point, and that is not stereotyping all Christians, just pointing out that fundamentalists are backwards people, which they are.
I personally have no problem with people being religious, only with fundamentalists.