>Pokethebear
>Logic
Choose one.

He shows images of two species of squirrels who got differentiated because they lived on different sides of a canyon and then doesn't even conclude what that means, he just says "guess that means they're related to rabbits and bananas, har har!" how is that an argument, let alone a coherent one? And he just keeps going like that, either mocking scientists or saying "all fish are from the biblical kind of fish" or "cauliflower and cabbage are from the same biblical kind of plant". He keeps using a concept he himself admitted he can't define. If I ever tried that stuff in a college essay, I'd fail the subject on the spot. If you wanna be taken seriously you can't work with vague terms like that, let alone try to use them as proof of something while at the same time admitting you don't even know what they mean. This guy is so full of shit I almost can't believe my ears when listening to him. And btw con man doesn't always have to be tied to money. Maybe he's in it for the ego boost.

Actually, out of curiosity I watched his "Best Arguments for evolution" video, and first off it could barely be called a lecture, he's just speaking in front of a monitor, unhinged stream of consciousness style (and in fact when I searched for lectures by him specifically, I only found very few very old videos so it seems that he doesn't really do lectures a lot, or at least not in video form). He didn't have a single cohesive argument in there. He says that evolution isn't real but "Biblical kind" totally is, that's why a lion and tiger can produce a liger but a lion can't bang a wolf and produce a catdog. He admits he can't explain what a Biblical kind even is but mocks scientists for explaining what evolution is. He keeps insulting Charles Darwin but it seems he never really read the Origins of Species because his knowledge of Darwin's theory is incredibly shallow, a middle schooler could probably debunk it.

I see it now, yeah you're right it is a bit weird. Still a good job though, I couldn't do a painting even half as good if I tried my darndest.

But it wouldn't be a luxury item if they didn't have a monopoly.

No honey he's what's called a con man

Cause she's not the centerpiece here ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

Yeah as far as I know there are some bad seeds in there who don't, and it's completely fair for them to be exposed (pun intended), but the ratio isn't any higher than in any other profession so the attack on them was mostly baseless.

Not even the monopoly part?

I'm an onyx and hematite gal myself because I just love the dark grey/gunmetal on black aesthetic

Most of them do though. When the thot audit hit, they posted screencaps of their tax ... documents? (English isn't my native language and I frankly have no idea what you call those) on Twitter as proof. The whole thing really is just incels being incels.

What an NPC thing to say, guest

Well there's always To catch a predator with Chris Hansen if you're looking for a show about pedos

Imo it's more that for a demon hunter badass, his forearm looks really delicate. Then again he doesn't need muscles to be strong because demon blood, but he's usually pretty ripped in the games

Hellgate: opened

"They have warehouses in multiple countries filled to the ceiling with diamonds, but don't sell more than so many a year, to purposefully drive the price up and make more money." Wasn't this part of the post trying to convey the same?

Czech here, same same.
Y'all English people should stop acting like you have a monopoly on politeness. We're all awkwardly polite and do stuff like this.

Yeah as far as I know anti-vaxxers don't necessarily tie their beliefs to religion. Homophobes, on the other hand...
Basically, imo any belief system including ideologies and political views can become toxic and dangerous, especially when the "I believe in something bigger than myself (be it a god, a cause, the future)" element kicks in. And there are people in pretty much any religion who just use it to be hateful assholes. That doesn't mean that religion is bad in itself, that said though I also think that when we look at abrahamic religions, their texts have more than enough material these hateful assholes can use, and we shouldn't just dismiss that.

Huh, I didn't know that. Might get myself checked because I always thought it was just my ears.