I think it wouldn't even be lucrative to bet on that. We all know he will.

I asked only for examples, not baseless assumptions or ad hominems. For instance, how do you know the guy only expresses his advocacy this way? Maybe he's active in many other ways. Furthermore, I'm not the one dragging other shit into this, lol. Or gossiping on other posts like Regina George.
But have it your way. I suppose not everyone is always in the mood to engage the frontal lobe, I understand.

There's a difference between the statement "all lives matter", something which I believe is the basis for human rights and common sense, and the All Lives Matter movement, which personally I've only ever seen reacting to BLM and trying to shut them up. I've never seen the All Lives Matter movement advocate for justice system or police reform or anything like it to prevent innocent deaths, only ever popping up when BLM does/says something. I believe the guy in the tweet was trying to point out that the All Lives Matter movement doesn't actually care about protecting lives, only about shutting up BLM, hence why they didn't talk about this poor boy at all. That said if you have any instances of ALM doing activism and advocating for improving the system, I'd love to see them and change my mind on the movement.

Well if the agenda is "cops shouldn't kill innocent people, least of all kids", then yeah, using a child killed by a cop as an example makes perfect sense.

Alright, famous. Bother making an actual substantive argument or are you just gonna armchair diagnose me here, clever pants?
Ah, why do I bother. I already know that you have nothing of substance to say.

No, kid. That's not the saddest thing here.
The saddest thing here is the two of you feeling so self righteous in your verbal fellatio and having no perception of the outside world or yourselves to the point you think you're in the right when your arguments have been nothing but ad hominems and fallacies. Read the thread again in a few hours when your hormones have calmed down, eh? Maybe you'll get some perspective.

Since I've realized I can't get an actual honest argument out of y'all, I'm just joking/trolling around at this point.

Yeah, cakelover probably wouldn't like me, I'm not very good at baking cake. I do make awesome nachos out of red lentils though.

Lol, ok kid. Close your bedroom door at night, else I'll hide under your bed and scare you. And eat the cake your mom made for you, too.

Alright, kid. I promise not to call you a birthing person not to offend you, how's that sound? Just to throw off the numbers since it's a daily occurrence for you apparently.

@diminuendo There are a lot of talking points on the matter from Fundamentalists/Christian conservatives, like "a woman's role is to be a mother and nurturer", "a woman must submit to a man's will/be a helper" or as @abel_hazard already mentioned, the concept of complementarianism, which yeah, "equal but different roles" but actually in reality not equal.
Bear in mind, I didn't say they're likely to see a woman as a birthing cow in general. Most people are more complex than that even with religious indoctrination. Just more likely than the wokes, comparatively.

>speaking of "fake outrage over things that weren't said..." The post doesn't mention trans people remotely
Sigh. So you really don't get it. You've been making TERF (TRANS Exclusionary Radical Feminists for those uninitiated) talking points here and sharing a TERF post. And you act surprised when trans people are brought up?
Show me one slur I made towards a person during this conversation. Meanwhile I can count like five you've thrown at me. There's one in like your every comment in this thread. This is really a case of the pot calling the kettle black.
>the vast majority of people that have bathroom "concerns" don't think all trans people are rapists.
I didn't say they were. I was listing examples of TERF talking points, hence the word AND in the sentence. You really gotta work on your reading comprehension, this isn't the first time this has happened.
As for the last quip, you don't know me at all, child. You know the strawman, nay, boogeyman, you've made of me in your head.

Silly quips aside, you really seem to not have realized that this "menstruator" argument is an extremely common TERF talking point, along with stuff like bathroom "concerns" and assuming that all trans women are secretly rapists. That's why I called it TERF stuff. If someone makes a post about how capitalism is bad and we should abolish private property, is it wrong to call the post a commie post when it didn't specifically mention it's a commie post?
Anyway, let me clarify. Nobody except for that one idiotic brainfart article actually refers to women as "menstruators". This notion that "people" do is a lie pushed by TERFs. It's fake outrage over a thing nobody actually says. Therefore the concern that we're being dehumanized is completely baseless in this case.
In reality, you're way more likely to be seen as a birthing cow by religious conservatives than the wokes. After all, Atwood's most famous novel is about a fundamentalist christian dystopia.