Comments
Follow Comments Sorted by time
chinchillabau5
· 10 years ago
· FIRST
Don't really understand this. Like is it a mock, saying that both are correct, or only one is?
1
kayrey
· 10 years ago
One. Bill is actually helping people. Offering the internet isn't helping people in third world countries. They'd rather have food and clothing.
14
chinchillabau5
· 10 years ago
A thousand times thank you.
4
thepacifist
· 10 years ago
The quotation marks around "help" ... How do you even screw up that bad?
1
thapwnzor
· 10 years ago
I don't see how this makes him a scumbag, he just isn't as much as a good guy. Having internet would really hinder developing countries?
2
guest
· 10 years ago
I wouldn't call him a scumbag for wanting to help. The intention is good, it just isn't practical or as useful. That's like if you're really hungry and one friend offers you mints, and then you see another one after that has a pizza and offers you some...does that make the first friend a scumbag? No. The first friend is only a scumbag if they have pizza AND mints. This whole thing is kind of convoluted, I'm gonna go eat some pizza.
4
guest
· 10 years ago
Zuckerberg has pizza and mints and near infinite resources
1
guest
· 10 years ago
But if they had the internet they could google pictures of food it's just as good right
1
dred
· 10 years ago
$4 billion
1
pripyatplatypus
· 10 years ago
Internet access is, by and large, a necessity now. Bringing high speed internet to impoverished areas will help with education, the economy, and a myriad of other things.
1
