I'm pretty sure it was just because he was short... but it's still funny either way

I know. 'Twas a joke.

Sure you did

I did. It's obvious that Shrek came out before Facebook if one thinks about it. Trying to sound smart by doubting me on my intended joke will hardly convince anyone. And fyi, it's not 2006, but 2004.

FYI 2004 was when it was founded and it was only available for Harvard students and a few other ivey league schools. It was open for everyone 13 and older in 2006. Maybe you should also take your advice

So what? Is the design of a logo that would once become a known one influenced by how big the user group is? It was there even in '04, only Facebook itself was not as famous. I don't see how this is relevant at all. Maybe you should stop throwing irrelevant information at me, it helps nothing. If you have something actually relevant to say, say it, but stop commenting just to say something.

All my comments have been relevant to your responses... and actually the logo wasn't an f then it was called the Facebook and had al Pacinos face

Wow, Al Pacino's face, how interesting and relevant. Not.
Why are you even saying this? We both know that Shrek came out before Facebook anyway so it's totally pointless to discuss the details of its foundation. Besides, I can't believe you still haven't understood that those "coincidence? I think not" jokes are often meant ironically to make fun of two absolutely unrelated situations.

I did but it was too silly to pass up and I'm saying this because you have tried to one up me by saying "fyi, it's not 2006, but 2004." I may have stopped after your first response if you hadn't added that then tried to correct me again.

We were discussing the official foundation date, which is 2004, not "when approximately it became famous".

Not when it became famous when anyone was allowed to use it. Before it was only available to Harvard and a couple of other ivey league schools. Therefore it wasnt Facebook then, it was "the facebook". The F wasn't used until it was public. Alsothe al pacinos face comment was relevant because they used that and not the f logo when it was "the facebook" in 2004. And you said the logo was there in 2004. I love how you tell me to stop commenting just to say something but each one of your responses tries to prove me wrong in one way or another.

That's because I don't know the details to founding Facebook, because they are absolutely irrelevant. I am not debating whether Facebook had the same logo in 2004, because it doesn't even matter. The logo became famous afterwards, and still it would be impossible for the makers of Shrek to use it as the movie came out years before that.
Maybe if you didn't dwell on pointless things I wouldn't have to waste my time here with you. The original point was that Shrek came out before Facebook. I told you I knew and the case would be dismissed if you didn't go around acting like things that anyone can google in five seconds are making you the sage of the era, because that's where I'm telling you that you're wrong.

If you don't know then why do you keep trying to correct me? No one is forcingredients you to respond...

Because you keep pointing out details and I keep telling you that it is idiotic as we've established the fact that it doesn't matter anyway long ago.

It may not matter but you were trying to prove me wrong in the date and the logo and all I was doing was correcting that. Had you not done that I wouldn't have had anything to say...

You two will never get along will you?

The world may never know

an actual fight in comments and im still at "facebook is only from 2006?!?!"

Lol depends on which one of us you ask.

If you call that a fight, I prefer the term "discussion". It sounds less brutish.

Something we can agree on

You finally agree! Thank god!