Comments
Follow Comments Sorted by time
lindsmolinari
· 8 years ago
· FIRST
i'm fairly certain there are not that many black pawns in a chess set....
12
emperorpenguin2
· 8 years ago
White and blacks combined thers still not that many.
purple_sleevies
· 8 years ago
Not the point
2
lindsmolinari
· 8 years ago
hon, it's important. sybols mean something because they're universal. if those chess fields were in 3 different colours, everybody would've freaked out. same thing with an unproportionate army of pawns.
herothewolfie
· 8 years ago
Scroll up and down quickly. It looks pretty cool that way.
guest
· 8 years ago
The pawns would easily lose
▼
fbi
· 8 years ago
Think about it
luka362
· 8 years ago
ikr, pawns are weeeaaaakk, the fact that they're even named pawns signifies that they're mostly sacrificial
▼
Show All
fbi
· 8 years ago
But they all defend each other, it's almost impossible for them to lose
1
luka362
· 8 years ago
not really the pawns have to move each turn to, you just have to pick them off one by one as they become vulnerable
▼
fbi
· 8 years ago
If you move them right it's possible to make it so none of them become vulnerable
luka362
· 8 years ago
actually at one point or another they will become vulnerable, you cant keep them safe forever
▼
bethorien
· 8 years ago
you can you move each column at a time each column one space per and you will never have any piece vulnerable to attack without counter.
luka362
· 8 years ago
actually yes, say you move three pieces that are next to each other in a column, the middle pice becomes vulnerable and can then be taken without sacrifice
bethorien
· 8 years ago
column is up and down not left and right.
luka362
· 8 years ago
that would still leave you vulnerable after moving one column twice
kezeal
· 8 years ago
You'd have to be an idiot to manage to make the pawns vulnerable. And if they get to the end, they'll become queens.
1
