To everyone who complains about how young Marisa Tomei is to play Aunt May in Civil War

The writers and producers are allowed to take certain liberties when it comes to casting, iris west and her family were not initially black but the cw show makes it work, if the actor is a good fit for the character they are trying to portray it doesn't matter what the comic book counter part looks like. These movies are somewhat based on the comics but they are in itself a different universe. The actress who played aunt may did a great job, and I expect great things from her, who gives a shit if she doesn't look like she's about to keel over, maybe that want her to last more than 3 movies.

"who gives a shit if she doesn't look like she's about to keel over"
A fair number of people, based on the amount of complaints about it. What's your point?

My point is people should stop complaining, it was a good fit, nobody should care how old she looks.

You actually think nobody should care about having preexisting characters look they way they look in the source material?

To an extent they should care, but to age variance? No not really, if they completely changed what the character stood for , than sure get up in arms, but there have been great characters in both tv and movies that have stood out and been great even though they looked very different from their counterpart, and some have looked exactly like the comic book character and have been awful for the part. I'm Just saying give it a chance, so far she's great as aunt may, will that change with the Spider-Man movie? We will see

That's still not a reason to completely dismiss people that have a problem with the way she looks. Sure it's probably an overreaction to call for her to be recast at this point, but that doesn't mean it's unreasonable to not like her looking significantly different than the source material.

How would I not dismiss someone who is really getting furious about who is playing an adapted comic figure in an entertainment movie? For some people it seems the entire world, including politics, art and pop culture, has been frozen in at some random point in the past and then they are offended the rest of the world keeps moving on. Nobody needs those people...

Yeah, we're not talking about the particular amount of fervor with which people complain about it. You should read a little more carefully.

You're right, we're not talking about that, none of us. You ok?

Your post is saying you dismiss those people based on them getting angry, and then some baseless shit about them being stuck in the past. Unless it's your time travel theory that you don't like, in which case that was not made clear.

You're kind of desperate to engage me in an argument, aren't you? You of all people here should shut ya mush when it comes to stating unwanted opinions.

Wow. Guys. It is just a movie. They had many with an older looking aunt. Now they don't this weekend another movie people can hate on will come out ... so let it go have a nice weekend

"You're kind of desperate to engage me in an argument, aren't you?"
I was trying to be funny, but it fell flat. You're the one who interjected for no reason.
"You of all people here should shut ya mush when it comes to stating unwanted opinions."
Nah.
"so let it go have a nice weekend"
It is possible to spend a small amount of time replying to comments and also remain in a good mood.

So its up to you to decide whether I have a valid reason to "interject"? Nah.

What valid reason could you have possibly had that would make your opinion "wanted"?

You're seriously asking this question someone else but not yourself? Very interesting, not so much surprising.

You're the one who introduced the qualifier of "wanted". I'm just asking you according your rules.
In reality it's not a relevant concept here, as people are expected to post their opinions about the picture in the comments.

Well, my rule is: you wanna say something? Say something.

That's a good rule, but then why use the term "unwanted opinion"?

cause apparently you don't want to see mine

Nah, man, comment wherever you want, I would just prefer that your comments have some substance, like an argument that isn't "people in the past think like that, so it's obviously wrong."

What substance is there in arguing against a paraphrase that does in no way represent anything I said? Again: you of all people...

How does what you said constitute any more of an argument than "It's 2016."?