There was a force in Italy ready to be there in fifteen minutes. All they were waiting for was the go order from Hilary. She didn't give it.
14Reply
deleted
· 8 years ago
As much as I hate Hillary, she didn't plan to have those soldiers killed. She made an incorrect decision that cost those men their lives, but she did not personally kill them.
I don't like either of them but I would rather have an idiot who will bang his chest and get nowhere than a criminal who will put us against each other
even Obama said she was not fit for office back in '08
Hillary may as well have killed them when she didn't give the troops, that were ready to go, by the way, the go order to go and rescue them. Whenever I say that to people, I always get, "but she didn't want to start an international incident", well fuck that! They started an international incident when they attacked our fucking embassy. This is fucking America, we do not let our people die to protect our reputation, we rescue them whatever the fucking cost. Fuck what the world thinks.
@chakun I completely agree. Hillary made excuses and tried to cover up the fact that the US government was incompetent about the whole situation. What about the video and all... The Obama administration has failed us in that regard. Take responsibility for your misdoings!
Stop with the political posts. For Christ's sake, this is Funsubstance, not your personal political platform. Take that crap back to Facebook where it belongs! *Reports all political crap*
While it's ok you all share the same sentiment as the guest what I find funny it that the guest won't bother to sign up but wants to complain about what's on the site.
That's so funny, aeacus basically said that visitors to the community should stop trying to change the community and you people chastised her. If I went to Scotland and started complaining about their laws traditions customs and food some of them would agree but others would call me a cunt and punch me in the mouth.
@pokethebear I'm a male, what I was trying to point out more was that the guest was spamming and that if they actually care about the site enough to report political post why haven't they joined?
Trump has never served in an office where he had control over military operations...I'm pretty sure ever secretary of state in the last 50 years has been decisions that gotten solders killed.
'If you're not a liberal when you're 25, you have no heart. If you're not a conservative by the time you're 35, you have no brain.'- apparently not Churchill, but maybe it was, not really sure, attributed to Churchill but probably isn't
Bernie isn't very good, but I'd take him over Hillary or Trump anytime. Even Clinton isn't as bad as trump. I thought that the race was to pick the BEST there was. There is probably someone better who doesn't even know it.
Twenty percent of Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign was funded by Saudi Arabia. Besides the fact that receiving campaign dollars from other countries is illegal, do we really want our president to be beholden to a country that kills homosexuals.
I don't like trump because of how arrogant and rude he is. He doesn't carry himself in a way a president should at all. He's comments he makes towards people who object to his views also makes me dislike him more. You can have your own views and have people disagree with you without makes sexist or insensitive remarks or without being rude. Especially if you're trying to run for president you need to act professional.
Because of how he would handle his power. By stopping people from immigrating to the US, he is practically dooming them. That is thousands of lives, dead. He would be more dangerous of a president.
Oh, so we care more about non-citizens than citizens? First of all, the Constitution states that the United States has every right as a sovereign nation to close its borders, it's also part of the reason that Britain wants to leave the EU. If these people want protection, that's fine, but they shouldn't complain when the conditions are horrible. You know what, fine, we'll take the women and the children, but send the fighting age men back home so they can fight for their homes and their freedoms. Why are so many fighting age men fleeing to Europe instead of fighting for their homes. If America was invaded, I assure you I would pack my things and head straight to my nearest recruiting center.
Yes but it is just inhumane. I don't care if they are American or not- they still matter. People in the U.S. military would have signed up for fighting, knowing the risks. Some people were just born into a country that is dangerous. I understand that you would head to a recruiting center, but many people wouldn't. Sometimes they cannot defend themselves- sometimes their own governments are their enemies. About the women and children but not men- I should hope to keep families together. If they come to the U.S., then they can fight with us. They hate he enemy as much as we do, and likely more. Americans are in less danger than people from other countries.
If your government is your enemy, you fight your government. It's the main reason that the founding fathers of my country made sure that we had the right to bear arms. In case that dreaded day whereupon the United States becomes a tyrranical state should ever come. That, and if some foreign entity should invade, we have militias ready to defend our homes. Instead of fleeing to Europe.
What I'm assaying is that when the government is your enemy, you don't just join the military. Sometimes, they can't fight. They don't have the weapons, the place to live, the food to live, the strength to fight. In America, we can give them those weapons so that they can fight. They can help us fight. If they could fight, I am sure they would. Some already are. I'm saying we could make it easier to.
It may seem like a good idea at first, but what happens when it is stolen by the enemy? Or they give it to the enemy. This has already happened. We have already done this, and it didn't work. If maybe they joined our numbers, it MIGHT work better. I just wish there was a better way.
Oh, so you want them to bring their war over here so OUR cities can be bombed? So OUR citizens can be killed and raped by ISIS? You are insane if you think brining their war over here is a good idea.
No, that isn't what I am saying at all. Look, ISIS wants land, and power. They don't want the United States. Their attacks on us are for our interfering with their getting what they want. I say we take in the countries citizens, let them get their bearings, then we ( military of us and ours allies, plus the able bodied refugees) kick them out of the Middle East. After that, I suppose we help them rebuild. They are going to be mostly on their own for that, but we need to stabilize them until they can fix it for themselves. We might take a hit but it would be worth it. This is the best case scenario. You can only imagine the worst. Back to our original debate, none of our current presidential candidates are up for this task. Trump would only make it worse.
@chakun Goddamn it I can't stand it. I was trying to be nice to you, but.... I used to live the Middle East. I have friends in the Middle East. They did nothing to deserve being steamrolled. All the history, the people, the culture... It means nothing to you. You would have it destroyed. All because you don't want people coming here. All because you cannot find the kindness to help people even if it might hurt you. Can you see beyond America? Because it is bigger than all that. It isn't us versus them. I hope you see that. I hope you understand this before you die, and I hope you turn around. I don't want your time on this earth to go to waste. I have had enough of this debate. Goodbye.
Many in the Obama administration did.
even Obama said she was not fit for office back in '08
I don't really care enough to check.