95% is still a worrying number of the rescues they euthanize. Horror stories of people being told they can adopt, and then being told to fuck off when they return to check up on a rescue because they wanted to euthanize anyway. Of course they would use examples of pets who are in severe and untreatable pain to try and explain why they euthanize, but when only 5% of animals leave alive into a new home, I can't help but think they're taking a radical solution to the problem.
Please don't fall for a bullshit campaign started by irresponsible desinformation mongers... http://consumerdeception.com/index.asp
.
This man should literally burn on a cross.
.
Peta's help is usually not asked for a happy, healthy animal, but for animals that have literally been thrown on the garbage. You may think of peta in its entirety whatever you want, I find many of their communication and argumentation policies and strategies dubious or even plain wrong, but I am entirely convinced that in general they are only killing animals when its the absolute last option. This smear campaign is just disgusting lies by despicable creatures who sneer at all living beings and only worship money.
You're literally an amalgamation of all of the worst types of internet liberals, fsuser. And now it seems you actually also fall for fucking PETA's lies too. How do you even FUNCTION?!
So let me get this right: by putting forward this number of "95%" you perpetuate a smear campaign paid for by meat producers and fast food chains, executed by a man who usually gets hired by liquor and tobacco manufacturers to steamroll their critics, and accuse me of falling for lies? And then you ask me how do I even function?
.
I'm not a friend of peta in general. I am a dedicated and convinced meat eater, I don't advocate human rights for animals, I make a substantial difference between human and non human animals. But to even imagine peta is more or less an animal auschwitz organisation is so super fucking dumb and clueless, it makes you even wonder in a place like this.
At this point I'm pretty sure you're just in opposition to whatever I say because I'm some sort of terrible person in your eyes. Peta has abnormally high euthanasia rates, and while I can get at what you're saying, not all animals can be treated, it just seems like they're taking the solution Hitler had for the jewish population. "Gee look at all these animals. They, and us, would all be better off if there were just, LESS of them."
you're probably not a terrible person, you're obviously just terribly stupid. You believe people who tell you that "under certain circumstances at certain times and places, it may have been up to 95% once" is the same as "95% in general". You believe a certain figure is "abnormal" and have never considered what would be a "normal" euthanasia rate, because all you do is parroting a person who is basically running a fact-free verbal ddos attack against peta. And last but not least, you have officially given up any right to be treated as a sane person by that Hitler comparison. Why the fuck is there no star right to your name, Isn't that how they mark the village idiots here?
The star marks users who are popular and friendly to the rest of the userbase. People like what they have to say and warm up to those people. Simple as that. There are statistics for Peta's Euthanasia rates. In 2012 they have a 94% of animals killed by being put down compared to the ones who got to live. And i'm pretty sure Peta gets money hand over fist while they put down animals. Less need for space to house animals, less food needed to feed them, and less medicine and therapy to care for cases that cost more than they can conceivably give. Guilt trip people about wearing fur, when they kill enough animals to put a clothing line out of business.
I get it, you get stars for popular opinions. Just like turds are very popular with blowflies. And as you apparently prefer not to keep things too complicated and differentiated, it shouldn't take you too long for that star.
.
As to Peta, it seems you completely refuse to hear their point of view, like why they do it and under which circumstances. Again: a lot of their policies are debatable, but one should argue with facts, not with the twisted, isolated misrepresentations spread by some spin doctors. You prefer to undiscriminatingly spread the argumentation of a ruthless lobbyist. Which is your right to do, it just makes you Mr. Rick Berman's bitch. No, wait, you're doing this for free, which rather makes you his tool.
Peta has abnormally high euthanasia rates, and more than willing to kill perfectly healthy and fine animals if they don't get the pitch perfect adopter they are looking for.
oy fsuser. how about u cite something other than PETA itself when defending it you dumb animal. If u were a judge and someone was in court for allegedly murdering someone, you'd let them go free if the suspect said 'I SWEAR IM INNOCENRT!!!!!!!' You stupid vapid cunt just get the fuck out.
*Court in session*
- Judge WrongX: Defendant, we find it very disturbing that practically 100% of your patients die shortly after they're admitted to your hospital. What have you got to say in your defense?
- Defendant: Your honour, we're in fact a hospice, that's a hospital dealing with....
- Judge WrongX: Hospice, shmospice, 100% is an abnormally high number. Don't confuse me with facts I don't understand nor want to take into consideration..
.
Now it's your turn again to tell me to get euthanized or something.
.
edit: not even two minutes and a devoted follower has given me the thumb down. What an honour to play such a special part in somebodies life.
A hospice is for TERMINALLY ill patients. An Animal Shelter CARES for animals, not stick needles with poison in them to spare them the terrors of the world. Not all strays and animals brought to Peta are faced with a terminal disease or life threatening conditions. All people who are brought to a Hospice are facing death on the clock, while the animals may not even have such worries, they might just want food and water, and a place to sleep away from the elements, and to get rid of pests like ticks and fleas.
"Not all strays and animals brought to Peta are faced with a terminal disease or life threatening conditions." - no, seems like a solid 5% wasn't. Where do you get your "info" from that however many of them were "perfectly fit" for adoption? Did you know that peta is the _only_ organization that accepts _all_ animals, as opposed to those "no-kill" centers?
Prove to me that people bring terminally ill animals to peta in DROVES. Prove to me that Peta doesn't euthanize pets unless they get the perfect adopter. They are perfectly fine with rejecting applicants if they don't meet up to scratch. Prove to me that Peta doesn't first consider killing the animal rather than caring for it. Prove to me that Euthanasia isn't the most handily applied tool and solution Peta has for all unwanted animals. And of course Peta would welcome all animals if it means they get to exercise their inner Nazi gas chamber fetish when it comes to killing animals. Why is it specifically no-kill shelters? What about other kinds of shelters? Is it becuase you're trying to build a case that falls apart from the gentlest prodding? And bullshit that only a solid 5% of animals were adoptable. 5% of animals that are rather friendly and endearing to human contact and presence? https://www.petakillsanimals.com/proof-peta-kills/#dubious_defense
"PETA Kills Animals is a project of the Center for Consumer Freedom" - nuff said. You want me to bring extensive proof when all you believe to know is this cynical desinformation campaign paid for by declared enemies of peta? Yeah, you really are fucking stupid. Fuck you, especially for your sick addiction to nazi comparisons.
You dismiss proof becuase it comes from someone you don't like, and think I have a Nazi fetish. I'm going to say I've argued politely and rationally, while you have repeatedly alluded or directly said I'm a fucking idiot. You are one lovely little snowflake, and I think the argument is over.
You're what's wrong with america. You mistake claim for proof and find it more convincing the more often it's repeated. Have fun with President Trump, he's what you deserve.
Quote from the peta.org blog:
"I always wonder how anyone cannot recognize that there is a world of difference between painlessly euthanizing animals out of compassion—aged, injured, sick, and dying animals whose guardians can’t afford euthanasia, for instance—as PETA does, and causing them to suffer terror, pain, and a prolonged death while struggling to survive on the streets, at the hands of untrained and uncaring “technicians,” or animal abusers.
It’s easy to point the finger at those who are forced to do the “dirty work” caused by a throwaway society’s casual acquisition and breeding of dogs and cats who end up homeless and unwanted, but at PETA, we will never turn our backs on neglected, unloved, and homeless animals—even if the best we can offer them is a painless release from a world that doesn’t have enough heart or homes with room for them."
.
In other words: fuck you disgusting, ignorant, lifeless piece of shit.
Yes, but they euthanize NINETY FUCKING FIVE PERCENT of their animals. There is NO FUCKING WAY THAT AL OF THOSE ANIMALS NEED TO DIE, YOU MINDLESS, IDIOTIC CUNT. There IS one animal that needs euthanasia, though. It's fucking YOU.
I would even discuss that, no shit. I am highly critical of them in general. But they are not organizing the animal holocaust, and to believe that would make you the WBC of common sense.
.
This man should literally burn on a cross.
.
Peta's help is usually not asked for a happy, healthy animal, but for animals that have literally been thrown on the garbage. You may think of peta in its entirety whatever you want, I find many of their communication and argumentation policies and strategies dubious or even plain wrong, but I am entirely convinced that in general they are only killing animals when its the absolute last option. This smear campaign is just disgusting lies by despicable creatures who sneer at all living beings and only worship money.
.
I'm not a friend of peta in general. I am a dedicated and convinced meat eater, I don't advocate human rights for animals, I make a substantial difference between human and non human animals. But to even imagine peta is more or less an animal auschwitz organisation is so super fucking dumb and clueless, it makes you even wonder in a place like this.
.
As to Peta, it seems you completely refuse to hear their point of view, like why they do it and under which circumstances. Again: a lot of their policies are debatable, but one should argue with facts, not with the twisted, isolated misrepresentations spread by some spin doctors. You prefer to undiscriminatingly spread the argumentation of a ruthless lobbyist. Which is your right to do, it just makes you Mr. Rick Berman's bitch. No, wait, you're doing this for free, which rather makes you his tool.
- Judge WrongX: Defendant, we find it very disturbing that practically 100% of your patients die shortly after they're admitted to your hospital. What have you got to say in your defense?
- Defendant: Your honour, we're in fact a hospice, that's a hospital dealing with....
- Judge WrongX: Hospice, shmospice, 100% is an abnormally high number. Don't confuse me with facts I don't understand nor want to take into consideration..
.
Now it's your turn again to tell me to get euthanized or something.
.
edit: not even two minutes and a devoted follower has given me the thumb down. What an honour to play such a special part in somebodies life.
http://www.snopes.com/critters/crusader/petakillspets.asp
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/religion/at-petas-shelter-most-animals-are-put-down-peta-calls-them-mercy-killings/2015/03/12/e84e9af2-c8fa-11e4-bea5-b893e7ac3fb3_story.html
"I always wonder how anyone cannot recognize that there is a world of difference between painlessly euthanizing animals out of compassion—aged, injured, sick, and dying animals whose guardians can’t afford euthanasia, for instance—as PETA does, and causing them to suffer terror, pain, and a prolonged death while struggling to survive on the streets, at the hands of untrained and uncaring “technicians,” or animal abusers.
It’s easy to point the finger at those who are forced to do the “dirty work” caused by a throwaway society’s casual acquisition and breeding of dogs and cats who end up homeless and unwanted, but at PETA, we will never turn our backs on neglected, unloved, and homeless animals—even if the best we can offer them is a painless release from a world that doesn’t have enough heart or homes with room for them."
.
In other words: fuck you disgusting, ignorant, lifeless piece of shit.