Scribd isn't a peer reviewed medical journal, anyone without any credentials or authority can "publish" through them.
Of those first few papers, I'm not seeing one single doctor. Not one out of over a dozen AND highly abbreviated names... Why?
• Papers 1 & 2; old "data" and debunked.
• Paper 3 not about vaccines and Autism. It's about gender selectivity.
• Paper 4 states right in the abstract that thimerosal is NOT a major heath hazard. Also, a mouse study.
• Paper 5 is a study in male/female Autism, not a vaccine link.
I can't help but notice that you stopped at 5. As soon as 8, you get papers talking about direct links between autism and vaccines. Those that don't are there simply to reinforce the conclusion that mercury and other heavy metals can cause autism, and that environmental exposure (like, say, from a vaccine) can adversely effect neurological development and function.
As for your "truth comes from authority" argument: corruption exists, and the vaccine industry today is a $24 billion industry (projected to be $61 billion by 2020). I can't help but get the feeling that someone trying to publish proof through one of your "official" sources would somehow not make it.
I stopped at five because that was the size of the sample before you needed to start downloading crap.
Besides, like I said above. Not a peer reviewed journal. It would be a waste of my time.
I'm vaccinated and I've come down with some of the things I'm vaccinated against. Personally I think it's your immune system and that there's no black and white. Vaccines work for some people but are bad for others.
I wouldn't force anything on anyone, but when it comes to something that can potentially save a life, I'd like them to be aware of the facts before they make the choice for themselves :P
Yeah, you're right. Let's just hope they make the choice that's best for them :P
deleted
· 7 years ago
It's not really none of my business because they can cause an epidemic and bring back diseases which were virtually eradicated, also they're hurting the herd immunity by choosing to not vaccinate their brats
Kids can't really be responsible for their own medical choices, my parents didn't ask to vaccinate me but I'm glad they did cause now I know I prolly won't die from polio or something. It's just the fact that people are endangering the lives of their children and other people pisses me off because they think they're doctors after reading one article that says vaccines cause autism (which who knows how many times has been proven false)
Medicine is all about dosage. One or two or maybe five aspirin will help your headache, but too many could cause hemorrhaging. And if you already have a preexisting condition, one alone could kill you. Iodine is essential to your health, but 2.1–2.4 grams for a human weighing 70 to 80 kg could kill you outright. Even things like water can have adverse effects. You'd probably get a good bit more mercury from the fish you eat than the number of vaccines you'd get in a lifetime.
all the people in this thread who don't realize how dirty vaccines are
yeesh
if they'd just spend the money to make them properly, none of this would ever be an issue
No, they're dirty because they contain heavy metals, human DNA, and who knows what else.
They should ONLY contain small amounts of the disease in question. By the way, as far as I have read, vaccines don't contain dead diseases/viruses, merely weakened ones.
It depends on the type of vaccine. It can range from disease-like particles, to dead disease, or weakened disease as you said. Yet, there are almost no cases where a person has actually aquired the disease from a vaccine. Although symptoms like slight fever to malaise can arise within the first few hours of getting a vaccine, it is rarely anything serious, unless the receiver had a preexisting condition, like an egg allergy or a weakened immune system. Compared to the actual disease, would you really want to take that risk?
The problem with vaccines isnt that you might catch the disease from them, it's that they fuck you up in other ways because they contain other crap in them that shouldn't be there.
http://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/SafetyAvailability/VaccineSafety/UCM096228#t1
I didn't bother to look through all of your papers, because there are so many, and so many that barely relate to your content, not to mention that many are hidden behind paywalls. However, most involve the effects of a mercury compound, thimerosal, which, since around 2001, has already been removed from almost all vaccines, other than some versions of the Influenza and DTaP vaccine, as well as some others which are rarely given in childhood.
Could you describe the minimum amount of mercury content that would cause neurological disorder, and show me which one of your studies shows it?
NOT A SINGLE STUDY
NOT ONE
NOPE
Of those first few papers, I'm not seeing one single doctor. Not one out of over a dozen AND highly abbreviated names... Why?
• Papers 1 & 2; old "data" and debunked.
• Paper 3 not about vaccines and Autism. It's about gender selectivity.
• Paper 4 states right in the abstract that thimerosal is NOT a major heath hazard. Also, a mouse study.
• Paper 5 is a study in male/female Autism, not a vaccine link.
Try this on for size, peer reviewed and medical journal published:
http://justthevax.blogspot.com/2014/03/75-studies-that-show-no-link-between.html?m=1
OR this CURRENT, AS IN NOW information:
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/concerns/autism.html
Show me one, ONE current paper peer reviewed and published on a journal in say NEJM, PNAS, BMJ or the Lancet that shows a link.
As for your "truth comes from authority" argument: corruption exists, and the vaccine industry today is a $24 billion industry (projected to be $61 billion by 2020). I can't help but get the feeling that someone trying to publish proof through one of your "official" sources would somehow not make it.
Besides, like I said above. Not a peer reviewed journal. It would be a waste of my time.
Also, I think mercury might be included in some.
yeesh
if they'd just spend the money to make them properly, none of this would ever be an issue
They should ONLY contain small amounts of the disease in question. By the way, as far as I have read, vaccines don't contain dead diseases/viruses, merely weakened ones.
no, they're not
I didn't bother to look through all of your papers, because there are so many, and so many that barely relate to your content, not to mention that many are hidden behind paywalls. However, most involve the effects of a mercury compound, thimerosal, which, since around 2001, has already been removed from almost all vaccines, other than some versions of the Influenza and DTaP vaccine, as well as some others which are rarely given in childhood.
Could you describe the minimum amount of mercury content that would cause neurological disorder, and show me which one of your studies shows it?